Allowed

Sunil Kumar @ Banti v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 Apr 2022CRLMB/5130/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner arrested under the NDPS Act for possessing contraband below commercial quantity. It directed the release of the petitioner on a personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000 along with two sureties, each in Rs. 1,00,000.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail subject to personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000 each.

Sunil Kumar @ Banti Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5130/2022

¶3

Sunil Kumar @ Banti S/o Omprakash, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Karadwali, Police Station Muklawa, District Shriganganagar. (Presently Lodged In Sub Jail, Raisinghnagar, Shriganganagar)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Awar Dan Ujjwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Muktiyar Khan, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶10

Order

¶11

20/04/2022

¶12

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.45/2022 of Police Station Muklawa, District Sriganganagar for the offences punishable under Section 8/18 of NDPS Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the recovered contraband is below commercial quantity and no other criminal case has been registered against the present petitioner. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMB-5130/2022]

¶18

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Sunil Kumar @ Banti S/o Omprakash shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.45/2022 of Police Station Muklawa, District Sriganganagar provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.2,00,000/with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶19

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶20

92-MS/-

Sunil Kumar @ Banti v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Kumar @ Banti v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jalam Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Suman Mandal Vs State of Rajasthan

Arun Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Abdul Karim Vs State of Rajasthan

Paramjeet Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Kuljeet Singh @ Rana Vs State