Allowed

Suman Mandal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC19 Apr 2022CRLMB/5099/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In connected bail applications by Suman Mandal and Mohd Saddam Sheikh under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the High Court granted bail considering the offences are triable by Magistrate, the accused are in judicial custody, and the trial may take a long time to conclude, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to be released on bail executing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Suman Mandal Vs State of Rajasthan — Money Laundering | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

(1 of 2)

¶2

[CRLMB-5099/2022]

¶3

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶4

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5099/2022

¶5

Suman Mandal S/o Parinay Mandal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Main Bazaar, Sultanpur, P.s. Chandipur, District East Madinapur, West Bengal. (Presently Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5101/2022

¶12

Mohd Saddam Sheikh S/o Shri Mohd Mustaq Sheikh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Murchha Road, Mathanitat Begumpur, Chowk Thana Police Station, Patna City, Distt. Patna (Bihar) (Confined In Central Jail, Jodhpur)

¶13

----Petitioner

¶14

Versus

¶15

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶16

----Respondent

¶17

For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Suman Agarwal Mr. Sabir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Muktiyar Khan, PP

¶18

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶19

Order

¶20

19/04/2022

¶21

The petitioners have been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.33/2022 of Police Station Banar, District Jodhpur for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 419, 406, 120B IPC. They have preferred these two separate bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶22

(2 of 2)

¶23

[CRLMB-5099/2022]

¶24

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the offences are triable by the Magistrate and the accused-petitioners are in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioners.

¶25

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applications. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶26

Accordingly, the bail applications filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Suman Mandal S/o Parinay Mandal & (2) Mohd Saddam Sheikh S/o Shri Mohd Mustaq Sheikh, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.33/2022 of Police Station Banar, District Jodhpur provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶27

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶28

129-130 MS/-

Suman Mandal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suman Mandal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rasid Khan Vs State

Lakhveer Singh Vagera Vs State of Rajasthan

Dharmahendra Choudhary Vs Union of India

Jalam Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Arun Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Shavej Khan Vs State