Allowed

Nandlal S/O Shri Gendilal Lodha v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Aug 2022CRLMB/5060/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court allowed an anticipatory bail application filed by Nandlal S/o Shri Gendilal Lodha in connection with an FIR under the NDPS Act and Arms Act. The petitioner was released on personal bond conditions without the court expressing an opinion on case merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on anticipatory bail required to furnish personal bond of Rs.50,000 two sureties and comply with investigation conditions.

Nandlal S/O Shri Gendilal Lodha Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5060/2022

¶3

Nandlal S/o Shri Gendilal Lodha, Resident of Bhumriya, Police Station Kamkhedi, District Jhalawar (Raj.)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narsi Prasad Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mahala, Public Prosecutor

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA

¶9

Order

¶10

02/08/2022

¶11

This anticipatory bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C in connection with FIR No.248/2021 registered at Police Station Aklera, District Jhalawar for the offences under Sections 8/15, 8/21 & 8/29 of NDPS Act and 3/25 of Arms Act.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no contraband has been recovered from the petitioner and he has no criminal antecedents. Counsel further submits that looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner may kindly be released on bail.

¶13

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶14

Taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-5060/2022]

¶17

the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

¶18

Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is allowed

¶19

and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioner Nandlal

¶20

S/o Shri Gendilal Lodha in the aforesaid FIR by the Investigation Officer, he shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of concerned SHO/IO on the following conditions:

¶21

i) That the petitioner will make himself available for the investigation as and when required by the investigation officer.

¶22

ii) That the petitioner will not leave India without permission of the Court.

¶23

iii) That the petitioner will not temper with the evidence or threaten or pressurize the witnesses in the case.

¶24

(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J

¶25

Satyendra/71

Nandlal S/O Shri Gendilal Lodha v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nandlal S/O Shri Gendilal Lodha v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nepal Singh S/O Moti Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Baluram @ Balram S/O Dhanna Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikram Singh S/O Dulhe Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mangal Chand S/O Todaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Devendra Kumar S/O Pawan Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Ajay Kumar S/O Tejram Vs State of Rajasthan