Allowed

Nepal Singh S/O Moti Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Aug 2022CRLMB/8120/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner, confined in judicial custody and not named in the FIR, was released on personal bond with two sureties in a money-bail case involving narcotic offences.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/ with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Judge.

Nepal Singh S/O Moti Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8120/2022

¶3

Nepal Singh S/o Moti Singh, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Peeplya Mohammad Police Station Garoth Distt Mandsour M.P. (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In Judicial Custody In Sub Jail Bhawanimandi Distt Jhalawar)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hari Shanker Gaur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna, Deputy Government Counsel (Public Prosecutor)

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA

¶10

Order

¶11

01/08/2022

¶12

This bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C in connection with FIR No.182/2022 registered at Police Station Bhawanimandi, District Jhalawar for the offences under Sections 8/22, 8/25 & 8/29 of NDPS Act.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and as per rejection bail order, alleged contraband has not been recovered from the petitioner. Counsel further submits that the petitioner is behind the bars since long and he has no criminal antecedents. Hence, the petitioner may kindly be released on bail.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-8120/2022]

¶16

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶17

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner Nepal Singh S/o Moti Singh shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each (out of which one surety shall be the resident of Jhalawar District) to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶18

(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J

¶19

Satyendra/13

Nepal Singh S/O Moti Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nepal Singh S/O Moti Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Zakir Hussain Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Zahid Khan and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Rajendra Singh Vs Ravindra Singh and Anr.

Baluram @ Balram S/O Dhanna Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikram Singh S/O Dulhe Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Neetesh Kumar Son of Shri Ramesh Chand Vs State of Rajasthan