Order upholding the granting of bail to two petitioners accused under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, and 471, reasoning that the delay in moving the application was not justified given the serious nature of the charges involved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
----Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta For : Mr. Mangal Saini, PP Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
07/09/2022
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= iqfyl Fkkuk] lwjoky] ftyk&lokbZek/kksiqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&186@2021 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 420] 467] 468] 471 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa fxjQ~rkjh dh vk'kadk ds QyLo:i vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk is'k fd;k x;k gSA
(2 of 3)
[CRLMB-4987/2022]
fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ gS fd vfHk;qDrx.k funksZ"k gSa] ekeyk flfoy izdfr dk gS] rhu leku izdfr dh izFke lwpuk fjiksVksZa esa vfHk;qDrx.k dks fu;fer tekur dh lqfo/kk iznku dh tk pqdh gS] dksbZ vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku 'ks"k ugha gS] vdkj.k fxjQ~rkj fd;k x;k rks muds fof/kd vf/kdkjksa dk guu gksxk] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k vkSj rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDrx.k bDlDysaV bUQzk LVsV bafM;k fyfeVsM esa funs'kd ds :i esa dk;Zjr jgs gSa rFkk muds }kjk gLrxr ifjoknhx.k ds lkFk&lkFk vU; O;fDr;ksa ls izoapuk dj lkjoku jkf'k fuos'k ds :i esa izkIr dh rFkk cnuh;friwoZd okfil ugha ykSVk;hA bl izdkj vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk rFkk vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku esa vfHk;qDrx.k dh vko';drk dks ns[krs gq, vfxze tekur dk izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksaZ ds leFkZu esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA
ifjoknh jktkjke }kjk ntZ djk;h x;h izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vc rd gq, vuqla/kku ds vuqlkj ;g vkjksi gS fd vfHk;qDrx.k us tek'kqnk jkf'k nqxquh fd;s tkus dk ykyp nsdj o vU; izyksHku o izoapuk djrs gq, jktkjke] txnh'k o [ksejkt ls dze'k% 1]85]000@&] 1]20]000@& rFkk 1]94]000@& :i;s izkIr fd;s rFkk dfFkr dwVjfpr ckWUM tkjh dj fn;s rFkk ckn esa ;g dEiuh cUn djds Hkkx x;s]
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-4987/2022]
ekeyk /kkjk 420] 467] 468] 471 Hkk-na-la- esa vuqla/kkuk/khu gSA vfHk;qDrx.k bl dEiuh esa funs'kd jgs gSa] os funksZ"k gksa] ,slk fu"d"kZ bl LVst ij ugha fn;k tk ldrkA rhu vU; izdj.kksa esa /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr tekur dh lqfo/kk nh x;h FkhA /kkjk 438 o 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr izLrqr nksuksa vkosnuksa ij fopkj djrs le; nksuksa ds ekin.M iFkd&iFkd gSaA
vr% izLrqr rdksZa] vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) yxk;s x;s vk{ksi] vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk ,oa izdj.k dh ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Mittal /122
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners accused under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code.
Whether the time gained by the petitioners in moving the bail application can justify granting bail.
Ramotar S/o Khyali Ram
Sunil Kumar S/o Ram Khiladi
The State Of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
