Justice Vyas allowed a repeat bail application under Section 439 CrPC, holding that previous orders did not preclude fresh consideration despite identical facts and lack of changed circumstances.
Bail granted on the grounds that the petitioner is an aged person and the continued confinement was not justified.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 4th Bail Application No.
5291/2022
Rajendra Son Of Pooranmal, Resident Of Raseedpur, Police Station Mundawar, District Dausa, Raj ( At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Bandikui, District Dausa)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Babu Lal Bairwa Mr. Mahendra Shandilya
For : Mr. Suresh Kumar, PP Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
06/09/2022
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g prqFkZ tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk e.Mkoj ftyk nkSlk esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 237@19 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 498,] 406] 304ch Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] iwoZ esa e`rdk ds dfFkr lqlkbV uksV ds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ dk tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;k x;k FkkA rRi'pkr ,Q,l,y fjiksVZ izkIr gqbZ gS ftlds vuqlkj
(2 of 3)
[CRLMB-5291/2022]
fooknjfgr gLrys[k ls fookfnr lqlkbM uksV rqyuk ;ksX; ugha ik;k x;k gS] izkFkhZ djhc ikSus rhu lky ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd, tkus ,oa mls tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;k ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj fd;kA
iwoZ esa vfHk;qDr dk izFke tekur vkosnu lHkh rF;ksa ij fopkj djus ds mijkar fnukad 10-06-20 dks [kkfjt fd;k x;k] f}rh; tekur vkosnu varxZr /kkjk 439 lifBr /kkjk 167¼2½ n.M izfdz;k lafgrk fnukad 19-10-20 dks [kkfjt fd;k x;k] rRi'pkr r`rh; tekur vkosnu fnukad 28-10-21 dks vLohdkj fd;k x;k gSA
gLrxr ekeys esa vfHk;qDr ij ;g vkjksi gS fd mldk fookg erdk ds lkFk fnukad 20-06-18 dks gqvk] fookg ds i'pkr erdk dks ngst dh ekax dks ysdj ijs'kku fd;k tkrk jgk vkSj fnukad 09-2-19 dks erdk }kjk vkRe gR;k dj yh x;h rFkk ;g Hkh vkjksi gS fd mlls iwoZ 10yk[k :i;s dh ekax dks ysdj erdk ds lkFk dwzjrkiw.kZ O;ogkj vfHk;qDr }kjk fd;k x;k ftldh lwpuk mlus vius ekrk firk dks Hkh nh FkhA ekeyk /kkjk 498,] 304 ch o 406 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds rgr fopkjk/khu gSA
izLrr ,Q,l,y fjiksVZ ds vuqlkj fookfnr lqlkbM uksV fooknjfgr gLrys[k ls rqyuk ;ksX; ugha ik;k x;k gS ysfdu
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-5291/2022]
ek= bl vk/kkj ij bl lqlkbM uksV dh lnHkkfodrk ;k vlnHkkfodrk ckcr bl LVst ij fu"d"kZ ugha fn;k tk ldrk] ;g lk{; dk fo"k; gSA iwoZ esa rhu tekur vkosnu [kkfjt gksus ds ckn ifjLFkfr;ksa esa dksbZ lkjoku ifjorZu ugha gqvk gSA vijk/k dh XkaHkhjrk] fu"i{k fopkj.k dh n`f"V ls o izdj.k esa miyC/k leLr rF;kRed fLFkfr dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds bl izdze ij xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr jktsUnz dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g prqFkZ tekur izkFkZuk i= vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Murari Lal Sharma /16
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail applications requiring re-adjudication when the same matter was already considered in previous applications.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajendra Son Of Pooranmal
State Of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
