Allowed

Bholashankar Sharma Son of Late Shri Raghunath Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Oct 2022CRLBC/101/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of two connected bail cancellation applications. The court upheld the refusal of anticipatory bail, finding insufficient evidence of criminal conspiracy and proving the existence of a criminal conspiracy to defraud the bank by forging signatures.

What did the court decide?

Bailable cancellation applications allowed; orders dated 10-06-2022 and 01-07-2022 upheld.

Bholashankar Sharma Son of Late Shri Raghunath Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No.

¶3

101/2022

¶4

Bholashankar Sharma Son Of Late Shri Raghunath Sharma, Aged About 66 Years, Resident Of Gram Sameedhi, Police Station Karwar District Bundi (Raj.)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

Manbhar Bai Wife Of Premraj, Resident Of Gram Manpura, Police Station Karwar District Bundi (Raj.)

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No.

¶12

150/2022

¶13

Bholashankar Sharma Son Of Late Shri Raghunath Sharma, Aged About 66 Years, Resident Of Gram Sameedhi, P.s. Karwar Distt. Bundi Raj.

¶14

----Petitioner

¶15

Versus

¶16

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶17

Premraj Son Of Late Shojilal, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Gram Manpura, Police Station Karwar Distt. Bundi Raj.

¶18

----Respondents

¶19

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudarshan Kumar Laddha. For : Mr. S S Mahala, PP Respondent(s)

¶20

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

(2 of 3)

[CRLBC-101/2022]

Order

12/10/2022

;g nksuksa tekur fujLrhdj.k izkFkZuk i= ,d gh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ls lacaf/kr gksus ds dkj.k budk ,d lkFk fuLrkj.k fd;k tk jgk gSA

¶26

fo}ku vij ls'ku U;k;ky;] uSuoka ftyk cwUnh }kjk iqfyl Fkkuk djoj ftyk cwanh esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 215@21 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 420] 467] 468] 470] 471] 120ch Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk esa vfHk;qDrk euHkj ckbZ o vfHk;qDr izsejkt dks /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr dze'k% fnukad 10-06-22 o 01-07-22 dks vfxze tekur dh lqfo/kk nh x;h Fkh] ftls fujLr djkus gsrq ifjoknh dh vksj ls ;g tekur fujLrhdj.k ds nksuksa vkosnu izLrqr gq, gSA

¶27

fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh dk dFku jgk fd vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk dwVjfpr nLrkostksa ds vk/kkj ij Qly chek djokdj mldh jkf'k izkIr dh gS] tks xaHkhj ekeyk gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, vfHk;qDr dks tekur nh tkuk mfpr ugha Fkk] vr% vfxze tekur vkns'k fujLr fd;k tkosA

¶28

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us fof/kuqlkj vkns'k ikfjr fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶29

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZ ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj fd;k ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶30

(3 of 3) [CRLBC-101/2022]

¶31

gLrxr ekeys esa ifjoknh us vius vkidks Jh ds'kojk; th egkjkt eafnj dk iqtkjh gksuk rFkk oknxzLr Hkwfe Mksgyh dh Hkwfe gksuk crkrs gq, tkfgj fd;k fd vfHk;qDrx.k us vukf/kdr :i ls vius vkidks d"kd crkrs gq, eafnj dh Hkwfe dh tekcanh is'k dj Qly chek dh jkf'k izkIr dh gSA

¶32

os dk'rdkj gS rFkk Qly chek dk'rdkj dh lqj{kk gsrq fu/kkZfjr gSA dksbZ Hkh nLrkost dwVjfpr gks] ,slk izFken"V;k izdV ugha gqvk gSA fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk lHkh lqlaxr rF;ksa ij fopkj djrs gq, foLrr ldkj.k vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gSA tekur vkns'k fnukad fnukad 10-06-22 o 01-07-22 dks fujLr fd;s tkus ds dze esa dksbZ mfpr vk/kkj izdV ugha gksus ls ;g tekur fujLrhdj.k ds nksuksa vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶33

ifj.kker% ifjoknh dh vksj ls /kkjk 439¼2½ naM izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr izLrqr ;g tekur fujLrhdj.k ds nksuksa vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkrs gSA

¶34

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶35

Murari Lal Sharma /8-9

Bholashankar Sharma Son of Late Shri Raghunath Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bholashankar Sharma Son of Late Shri Raghunath Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dimple Goyal S/O Kuber Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Maansingh S/O Gangaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Naurangi Devi W/O Suresh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohamed Aarif @ Sonu S/O Shri Khan Mohamed Vs State of Rajasthan

Mujahid Ahmad S/O Noor Ali Vs State of Rajasthan

Monu @ Mayank S/O Sahab Singh Vs State of Rajasthan