Allowed

Ramniwas @ Rama Manju v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 May 2022CRLMB/2874/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to petitioners Farsa Ram and Ramniwas @ Rama Manju arrested in connection with FIR No. 263/2021. The High Court allowed bail notwithstanding the serious nature of charges, directing execution of a personal bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to be released on bail subject to execution of personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Ramniwas @ Rama Manju Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4375/2022

¶3

Farsa Ram S/o Bhagwana Ram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Kanasar Ps Bap Distt. Jodhpur (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Jodhpur)

----Petitioner

Versus

State, Through Pp

----Respondent

Connected With

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2874/2022 Ramniwas @ Rama Manju S/o Shri Andaram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Kanasar, P.s. Bap, District Jdohpur (Raj.) (Presently Lodged At Central Jail, Jodhpur)

¶10

----Petitioner

¶11

Versus

¶12

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶13

----Respondent

¶14

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Arjun Singh
	Mr.	Kirta Ram Meghwal
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Mahipal Bishnoi,PP.

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶16

Order

¶17

12/05/2022

¶18

The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 263/2021 of Police Station Bap, District Jodhpur, for the offence punishable under Sections 457, 380, 307, 447, 458, 395 of IPC and under Section 3/25 of Arms Act. They have preferred these bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶19

Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case and no one

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

[CRLMB-4375/2022]

¶22

has been injured in this case. Counsels further submit that challan of the case has already been presented. The accused-petitioners are in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioners.

¶23

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applications. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶24

Accordingly, the bail applications filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Farsa Ram S/o Bhagwana Ram and (2) Ramniwas @ Rama Manju S/o Shri Andaram, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.263/2021 of Police Station Bap, District Jodhpur, provided they execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶25

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶26

45-46-Ishan-raksha/-

Ramniwas @ Rama Manju v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramniwas @ Rama Manju v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narpat Singh Vs State

Balvinder @ Bindu @ Binder Vs State

Toluram @ Tolaram Vs State

Kiranbala Vs State

Prem Singh Vs State

Dungar Singh @ Jhunjhar Singh Vs State