The High Court of Rajasthan allowed bail to the accused-petitioner, asserting the case was false and further incarceration was unnecessary. A personal bond with sureties was ordered.
Accused to be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 271/2022
Pramod S/o Bheemaram @ Bheem Singh, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Mataur Police Station Khairthal Alwar District Alwar ( Raj.) (Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In Jail Kishangarhbas Alwar.)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. MS Saini, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
19/04/2022
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-271/2022]
injure, clearly shows the intent of the accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner is behind the bars since two and half years. His further incarceration would not be required till disposal of the case.
(FARJAND ALI),J
SAHIL SONI /22
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused-petitioner required incarceration pending disposal of the case considering the injury to the victim and possession of a firearm.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pramod S/o Bheemaram @ Bheem Singh
State Of Rajasthan
Farjand Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
