In a bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail, the High Court held that the application had become infructuous and dismissed it without granting bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2519/2022
Manoj Kumar @ Vinod Swami S/o Sh. Atmaram, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Near Sahwa Bus Stand, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
The State of Rajasthan through PP
| For Petitioner(s) | -- : Mr. Suresh Nehra |
--Respondent |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. S.S. Rajpurohit,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Order
08/03/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the present bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail has been rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the present bail application moved on behalf of the petitioner - Manoj Kumar @ Vinod Swami S/o Sh. Atmaram, under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA),J
57-Rashi/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application rendered infructuous should be dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manoj Kumar @ Vinod Swami S/o Sh. Atmaram
The State of Rajasthan through PP
Devendra Kachhawaha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
