Allowed

Sunil @ Vijay v. State

Rajasthan HC8 Mar 2022CRLMB/2482/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed the bail application of the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.190/2020 involving cheating and criminal conspiracy. Considering the offences are triable by a Magistrate, bail has been granted to co-accused, and trial will take time, the Court ordered the petitioner's release on personal and surety bonds without expressing an opinion o

What did the court decide?

The petitioner ordered to be released on bail on a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each, with a stipulation to appear on all dates.

Sunil @ Vijay Vs State — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2482/2022

¶3

Sunil @ Vijay S/o Mahendra Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ward No. 10, Purani Abbadi, Near Hanuman Mandir, Sriganganagar At Present Flat No. 2102, Angel Marcuri, Ahinsha Part-2 Indrapuram, Gajiyabad, State Utter Pradesh. (Presently Lodged At Central Jail, Udaipur).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan through PP

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Bidan Halu For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Rajpurohit, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA

¶10

Order

¶11

08/03/2022

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.190/2020, Police Station Savina, District Udaipur, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 406 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Heard and considered arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that offence is triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet has filed; benefit of bail has been granted to co-accused persons Sanjay Satpati and Girish Gandhi @ Gagan Gandhi; and trial will take time. With these

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-2482/2022]

¶17

submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the benefit of bail may be granted to the petitioner.

¶18

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application of the accused-petitioner and stated that fourteen other cases have been registered against the accused-petitioner.

¶19

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly looking to the facts that offences are triable by the First Class Magistrate; benefit of bail has been granted by this Court to co-accused persons Sanjay Satpati (Bail Application No.2480/2022) and Girish Gandhi @ Gagan Gandhi (Bail Application No.1344/2022) vide order dated 25.02.2022; further investigation and trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

¶20

Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner, Sunil @ Vijay S/o Mahendra Singh, arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.190/2020, Police Station Savina, District Udaipur, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each (one shall be a local surety) to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA),J

¶22

35-Rashi/-

Sunil @ Vijay v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil @ Vijay v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ratan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Kesi Devi Vs State

Pushkar Lal Vs State

Sita Ram Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Manoj Kumar @ Vinod Swami Vs the State of Rajasthan

Prakash Vs State