Lokeshnath v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew bail application and sought liberty. Court dismissed application as not pressed, directed recording of prosecutrix statement.
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed as not pressed; direction to trial court to record statement of prosecutrix.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2180/2022
Lokeshnath S/o Madan Nath, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Shiv Colony Undhali Dungre Ke Pas, P.s. Sadar, Dist. Bundi (Guj.). (Lodged In Dist. Jail, Bhilwara).
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through Pp
| ----Respondent | ||
|---|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : | Mr. J.V.S. Deora |
| For Respondent(s) | : | Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi, PP Mr. Mohan Ram Choudhary |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG Order
23/09/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the bail application and seeks liberty to file a fresh bail application after recording the statement of prosecutrix.
Hence, the bail application is hereby dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Lokeshnath S/o Madan Nath
- respondent
State
Coram
Manoj Kumar Garg
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/2180/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court