Allowed

Ashok Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC22 Sept 2022CRLMB/10266/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a criminal bail application where the petitioner sought anticipatory bail apprehending arrest for offences under various sections of the IPC. The High Court found that a compromise had been arrived at between parties and allowed the application, contingent upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted directed to be released upon arrest subject to furnishing personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Ashok Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 10266/2022

¶3

Ashok Kumar S/o Guman Dan, Aged About 28 Years, B/c Rav, R/o Mahilawas, Tehsil Siwana, District Barmer (Raj.).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Mohan Ram
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Mukhtiyar Kh	an, Public Prosecutor
	Mr. Hitendra	Singh, for the
	complainant

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶10

Order

¶11

22/09/2022

¶12

This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No. 154/2022, Police Station Sivana, District Barmer for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the compromise has been arrived at between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner behind the bars for indefinite time. Therefore, the petitioner may be released on anticipatory bail.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the

¶15

prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶16

Learned counsel for the complainant concurs the fact of compromise.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-10266/2022]

¶19

Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order.

¶20

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Ashok Kumar S/o Guman Dan in connection with FIR No. 154/2022, Police Station Sivana, District Barmer, he shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-

¶22

(i). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶23

(ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer and;

¶24

(iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶25

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶26

89-Mak/-

Ashok Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kuldip Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Pramod Kajla Vs State of Rajasthan

Jaipal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Nirmal Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Kuldeep Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Rupa Ram @ Rup Vs State of Rajasthan