Dismissed

Sunil Kumar @ Sonu Sethi v. State

Rajasthan HC25 Apr 2022CRLMB/1727/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment rejects an interim bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by a petitioner arrested for NDPS offenses. Relying on the Public Prosecutor's report that the petitioner's wife's condition is not serious, the court finds no grounds for bail and dismisses the application.

What did the court decide?

The interim bail application filed by the petitioner is hereby dismissed.

Sunil Kumar @ Sonu Sethi Vs State — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1727/2022

¶3

Sunil Kumar @ Sonu Sethi S/o Mukandlal, Aged About 42 Years, R/o 50-C Block, Ward No. 14, Srikaranpur Police Station Srikaranpur, Dist. Sri Ganganagar. (Presently Lodged In Srikaranpur Sub Jail).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.K. Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Javed Gauri, PP.

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶10

Order

¶11

25/04/2022

¶12

The present interim bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.173/2018 Police Station Srikaranpur, District Sri Ganganagar for the offences punishable under Sections 8/18 & 29 of NDPS Act.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the wife of the present petitioner is suffering from serious disease of kidney and there is no other mature person in the family, who can take care of his wife. The petitioner is behind the bars and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the petitioner may be enlarged on interim bail.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the interim bail and submits that the treatment of the wife of petitioner is

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-1727/2022]

¶17

going on and the condition of the patient is not serious, therefore, interim bail may not be granted to the petitioner.

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.

¶19

I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

¶20

According to the report submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor, the treatment of the wife of petitioner is going on and the condition of the wife of the petitioner is not serious. In these circumstances, no case for grant of interim bail is made out. Hence, the present interim bail application filed by the petitioner is

¶21

hereby dismissed.

¶22

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶23

2-Ishan-raksha/-

Sunil Kumar @ Sonu Sethi v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Kumar @ Sonu Sethi v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saraswati and Ors. Vs Pemaram Dogwal and Ors.

Ramdev Verma @ Rama Vs State of Rajasthan

Chhoga Lal Vs State

Bhagwati Lal Vs State

Pabu Ram Vs State

Arjun Singh Vs State