The High Court allowed bail to the petitioner in a case under the Arms Act. The court relied on bail grounds including false implication and prolonged trial duration without delving into case merits.
Petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17081/2022
Rajulal S/o Ramharimeena, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Badoli Police Station Wajirpur Distt. Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ( At Present Confined In Distt. Jail Karauli (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.L. Nasuna, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
23/11/2022
This Criminal Misc. Bail Application has been brought under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., seeking regular bail in connection with FIR No.465/2022 registered at Police Station Hindoncity, District Karauli, for offence under Sections 3/25 of Arms Act.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The accused-petitioner has nothing to do with the alleged offences. He is behind the bars since long time. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-17081/2022]
overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused on bail.
Therefore, the bail application is allowed. Accused-petitioner Rajulal S/o Ramharimeena shall be released on bail, if he is not required in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any other court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when they are called upon to do so.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
PREETI VALECHA /287
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused should be granted regular bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in a case under the Arms Act.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajulal S/o Ramharimeena
State Of Rajasthan
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
