Allowed

Akshay Kumar S/O Kamlesh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC21 Jul 2022CRLMB/1684/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed anticipatory bail to the applicant in FIR No. 25/2022 for rape under Section 378 IPC. Court directed release on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each upon arrest.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed with personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each; directed to be released upon arrest if bonds furnished.

Akshay Kumar S/O Kamlesh Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR KJASTHAN

¶2

BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1684/2022

¶4

Akshay Kumar S/o Kamlesh, R/o Rawanjna Chaud PS Rawanjna Dungar Tehsil And Distt. Sawaimadhopur

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶7

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain . . . If ,,,--, , .-.
1 i
For esondeht(s) : Mr. Babulal Nasuna, PP~-,L$"
.; e
? \d ' ,. ,,*
, . . ' 1C r
^L..,. *, ' .% . - 2 -". -
5'' '
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
. .

¶8

-. -.
1, .
21/Q7/2022 ,>- ^ 1 \ .' ,,: i .c ' !
1. Apprehending the acrest, 'the, $resetit . ,$,A bail application has
. ."-. .:'.; /"- '.,. , * * >:
I v->,p :, .'\ ?+,$ '
been filed by the petitiosier.:;+kha;'g~,har . "-!+ ', . p-p G ; >; <,p'.l- - S/o Kamlesh under
, . t,: + , . 5;;. , ,
Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection a wigh I, :FIR No.25/2022 registered
,I ' i IS 'G
at Police Station awanjria :Dupgai,, iistrict Sawai Madhopur for
. f,q9 .2& /$31..,-Jt~'>=-;,
. << t,.' .-j-., ,::( '.: $7
the offence(s) under Sectioh '.. 378 lp@le;,q';.+-
, - P I -_ , :;.,;, ->,>I <'-x!;;; - '.,j . ,L-"> i,:ir; 1 q<br>2. Learned counsel '.fbr'the:&etjtioyi&&ubmits -. < ., , -. t.ys;,_ -4-a El. .+.,..Ai" luu.r ) 8>:<;.'-z .t?:,-.l'.:;:;A.b. ;;2 ;/ i?,:,./ that he has
offence. I- .-),.-g-41q -It is the case where no
nothing to do with the alleged . ill" '
>$ ,-. , < . % ,I ;
i "r
ajstndinl of the &Gld be required.
3. Learned public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail
application.

¶9

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the Petitioner and taking into account the totality of facts and Circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it Just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶10

AccordinCJl~~ the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The
Officer, Police Station Rawanjna Dungar,
~istrict Sawa+i Madhopur in F.I.R. No. 25/2022 is directed that in
the event of arrest of the petitioner he shall be released on bail,
provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-
with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the
satisfaction of the S. H .O/I .O/Arresting Officer of the concerned
. , .. :i , 'P r.
Police Station on the. foilohinb , ,, . + ,:, ,:? ...a ;:.
. - "&n83i&"gi: A,. I,
+ \ -., <I /,-'--,." .
\ ~ P<br>(i) that!i::';;the petitioner shall make Hijtpylf
avai~~bl$for interrogation by a police officer asf&d
wpn'required; +.L- ,f pchA+ Y

¶11

(ii) "'that the petitioner shall not directly oP
indirectly make any inducemept, ;)-: :::,;,".:, e t threat or promise
to any person acqu.ai.,qted;yt&ithe -.,, % ! %: , fasts of the case
so as to dissuade. , -_ 6i~:$o~~~~;isclps~n$~uch _ . . 2 ..-, . -d, . p. ..; ::-, facts to
the co u (iii) that rt o r the a n 2:: el@>~?~~~~~~~~~ff+.:-PIeave 4 :; ..' .+r?? -. .> i ,-. fce:~~~6:f,pfid.,;j;:; ,<, . - , ,.*, ... ,;.;.:.' ; .,,:, b 5 3 ,,.,/ ,... .,. " %-+.. -. , , !. ,;,rx; ,$: .f:,, L;.' <Zi.<." <,;h;I,y: India
without p revi o s p~$~$$$$-~~~~~$,rt
,.; ;7,;,;;$'>,2 :;tp ;,. <, j?;,:, ::;;:; ,f!.\ : }.!')
. ?;,+, :,, ; . . ;. , , , f >-;"< %, -, $ fl,L'.<~, ,;.>
$ ;. ,.,P ;-;,. _ 5 FC -. +;; i. (, -3,7+rjJ;!jP f,;.,$-?: -- -; 22!.j,:i;<$a${>: ;z ~T;.{!J
;'! : ?--,.I. 1: &a'
;s .. :. , 1 ; ' j h! (FARJAND ALI)J
.. ;, ,.;,y :,: ti ,I:,= g , -7 y; ,, ; 1 .J - !: 2,i, =-. . it j j
- i,. ,$ i;,::y&., ;,>; ii i,, . , :<,. ii; j+ $ J .'.* ! i\ * ;.<?' 1
, ' ;! , . .SA, , ,;+,? , ; :-.?; " c;.?:,';?? )$,;>:<
?..
&p;g$k3qi ;.,- %.$$4q-f2 =.3-):.: jp -..' t+5
!,# , :f , ;,,fl.- , , .j , <, !.; , >!,, , ,/;.J%:L F- +?.;i:!i 9)
$ f . + <zj--~z'j~~,+ <!2; ;
f$; , *. --:;+ .,,-.,, ->.-
-.,.; >,?t .fj# t,>g,<"&dj i $
)::',(.. ,. '.""'. , . .; '.E:".yyypi-i- ., .. . ,: .'%.".\ . . $, '.p4zi/; ,"y ,,y.:;7 ;a. :@$;&$y
-,=.II.--,. ;,,.P;z:, - --.., ;L;r1?1"57-'14.1 ,, . ... , :.:sj3;LpT+$:;i. *".I.?.,
, <>:l,::> -,=, >2L.:z.~~:<,>d

Akshay Kumar S/O Kamlesh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akshay Kumar S/O Kamlesh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Son of Shri Kaptan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Vimlesh @ Mota S/O Sushil Sharma, Vs State of Rajasthan

Kailash Chand Vs Sitaram and Others

Bansi Tomar Son of Ramesh Tomar Vs State of Rajasthan

Vinod Son of Shri Chitralal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sarveshver Das @ Kachida Wala Baba Vs State