Allowed

Ram Mohan Meena S/O Shri Ratiram Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC22 Aug 2022CRLMB/1656/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the petitioner's anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. regarding offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC and the Rajasthan Public Examination Act, 1992, directing his release if arrested upon furnishing a bond.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; petitioner to be released on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each if arrested.

Ram Mohan Meena S/O Shri Ratiram Meena Vs State of… — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1656/2022

¶3

Ram Mohan Meena S/o Shri Ratiram Meena, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Vill. Gurda Tehsil And Distt. Karauli

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. BL Nasuna, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

¶10

Order

¶11

22/08/2022

¶12

Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No. 555/2021 registered at Police Station Brahmpuri, District Jaipur City North for the offence(s) under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B IPC and Sections 5 & 6 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 1992, the petitioner has preferred this anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶13

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the present accused-petitioner has nothing to do with the alleged offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. The case is exclusively triable by the Court of Magistrate. Trial is likely to take long time to conclude. His custodial interrogation would not be required for any purpose.

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMB-1656/2022]

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Having considered the overall allegations leveled in the FIR, contentions made by the counsel for the accused-petitioner and taking into account the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶17

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Brahmpuri, District Jaipur City North in F.I.R. No. 555/2021 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Ram Mohan Meena S/o Shri Ratiram Meena, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶18

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶19

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶20

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶21

(FARJAND ALI),J

¶22

SAHIL/179

Ram Mohan Meena S/O Shri Ratiram Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Mohan Meena S/O Shri Ratiram Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Madan Lal Vs Sampat Raj

Vikram Deora Vs State of Rajasthan

Raju @Rajendra Vs State of Rajasthan

Ayub S/O Fajru Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamal Kishore S/O Durgalal Vs State of Rajasthan

Basant Mandal S/O Late Shri Hemant Mandal Vs State of Rajasthan