Allowed

Surendra Singh Hada S/O Bhanwar Singh Hada v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC16 May 2022CRLMB/1538/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed an anticipatory bail application filed by Surendra Singh Hada in connection with FIR No. 392/2021. The petitioner was directed to furnish a personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed subject to surrender of a personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of ₹25,000 each along with specified conditions.

Surendra Singh Hada S/O Bhanwar Singh Hada Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1538/2022

¶3

Surendra Singh Hada S/o Bhanwar Singh Hada, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Colony Ps Kanwas Distt. Kota Raj.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dheeraj Tripathi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Meena, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

¶10

Order

¶11

16/05/2022

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 392/2021 registered at Police Station Sadar Bundi, District Bundi for the offence(s) under Sections 323, 341, 354, 504, 506, 420 & 406 IPC.

¶13

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The accused-petitioner has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel submits that there is a dispute of liquidation of amount in between the partners. The accused-petitioner has joined the investigation. No custodial interrogation would be required for any purpose.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-1538/2022]

¶17

Having considered the overall allegations leveled in the FIR

¶18

and contentions made by the counsel for the accused-petitioner.

¶19

Taking into account the totality of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner.

¶20

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Sadar Bundi, District Bundi in F.I.R. No. 392/2021 is directed that in the event of arrest

¶21

of the petitioner Surendra Singh Hada S/o Bhanwar Singh Hada, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶22

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶23

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶24

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶25

(FARJAND ALI),J

¶26

SAHIL SONI /124

Surendra Singh Hada S/O Bhanwar Singh Hada v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Singh Hada S/O Bhanwar Singh Hada v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra Singh S/O Than Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Satya Narain Son of Shri Ganga Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Jitendra Lalwani Vs the Dist. and Sessions Judge,Jodhpur

Pappulal @ Ramprasad Son of Shri Mangilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahendra Singh S/O Shri Fatehsingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Shakuntala W/O Late Banji Singh Vs State of Rajasthan