Allowed

Dal Singh v. State

Rajasthan HC7 Sept 2022CRLMB/14/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment considers an application for anticipatory bail filed by Dal Singh fearing arrest under Section 438 CrPC. The court noted a compromise between parties but notes opposition by the Public Prosecutor. Ultimately, the court granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions including furnishing a bond and ensuring availability for interrogation. The case relates to offences under Sections 42

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each, with conditions to appear for interrogation and not leave India.

Dal Singh Vs State — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

(1 of 2)

¶2

[CRLMB-14/2022]

¶3

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶4

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14/2022

¶5

Dal Singh S/o Sh. Hari Ram, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Nuva Tehsil Bhadra Dist. Hanumangarh.

----Petitioner

Versus

State, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. VK Bhadu
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. AR Choudhary, PP
	Mr. Jitendra Ojha

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶12

Order

¶13

07/09/2022

¶14

This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.197/2021, Police Station Gogamedi Hanumangarh for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B IPC.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the compromise has been arrived at between the parties, therefore no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner behind the bars for indefinite time. Thus, the petitioner may be released on anticipatory bail.

¶16

Learned counsel for the complainant concurs the fact of compromise, however, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶17

Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order.

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CRLMB-14/2022]

¶20

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Dal Singh S/o Sh. Hari Ram in connection with FIR No.197/2021, Police Station Gogamedi Hanumangarh, the petitioner shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-

¶22

(i). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶23

(ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and

¶24

(iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶25

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶26

125-MS/-

Dal Singh v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dal Singh v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prahlad Mavatwal Vs State of Rajasthan

Santosh Vs State of Rajasthan

Manish Chadda @ Varun Coll @ Doctor Vikrant Vs State

Anisha Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra Vs State of Rajasthan

Sumra Anwar Bhai Vs State