Allowed

Manish Chadda @ Varun Coll @ Doctor Vikrant v. State

Rajasthan HC6 Sept 2022CRLMB/6793/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Jodhpur allowed a bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for the petitioner, who was in judicial custody charged with offences under the IPC. The court deemed it just and proper to grant bail subject to the submission of a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail via personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000 each to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Manish Chadda @ Varun Coll @ Doctor Vikrant Vs State — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6793/2022

¶3

Manish Chadda @ Varun Coll @ Doctor Vikrant S/o Rajendra Pal @ Brajbhushan, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Jaina Kadal Srinagar Ps Jaina Kadal Dist. Srinagar (Kashmir) At Present B-156 Dlf, Motinagar Delhi (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail Bali)

----Petitioner

Versus

State, Through Pp

	----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. S.K. Sainee
	Mr. Shaitan Singh Badgujar
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi,PP.

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶9

Order

¶10

06/09/2022

¶11

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.51/2020 of Police Station Nana, District Pali, for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that offences are triable by Magistrate. Counsel further submits that similarly situated co-accused Rajendra Pal @ Brijbhusan has already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court and the case of present petitioner is similar to that of co-accused. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody since 07.03.2022 and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accusedpetitioner.

¶13

(2 of 2)

¶14

[CRLMB-6793/2022]

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶16

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Manish Chadda @ Varun Coll @ Doctor Vikrant S/o Rajendra Pal @ Brajbhushan, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.51/2020 of Police Station Nana, District Pali provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶17

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶18

19-raksha/-

Manish Chadda @ Varun Coll @ Doctor Vikrant v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Chadda @ Varun Coll @ Doctor Vikrant v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ankit Boob Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunil Kumar Vs State

Ramesh Kumar Rathore Vs State

Prahlad Mavatwal Vs State of Rajasthan

Santosh Vs State of Rajasthan

Nizam Khan Vs State of Rajasthan