Allowed

Karan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC13 Sept 2022CRLMB/12025/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court at Jodhpur granted bail to two petitioners arrested in an FIR involving cheating and forgery offences, directing execution of a personal bond with sureties and trial court satisfaction.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners granted bail in connection with FIR No.118/2022, directed to execute personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Karan Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12025/2022

¶3

Karan S/o Kalu Lal Patel, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Tana, Akola Police Station, District Chittorgarh. (Lodged In District Jail, Chittorgarh)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

Connected With

¶9

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12026/2022 Surendra Kumar @ Raju S/o Radhey Shyam Somani, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Badodiya, Presently R/o Pratap Colony, Chanderia Police Station, Chanderia, District Chittorgarh. (Lodged In District Jail, Chittorgarh)

¶10

----Petitioner

¶11

Versus

¶12

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶13

----Respondent

¶14

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. S.S. Shaktawat
		Mr. B.P.S. Inda
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi,PP.

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶16

Order

¶17

13/09/2022

¶18

The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.118/2022 of Police Station Chittorgarh Kotwali, District Chittorgarh, for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 419, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC. They have preferred these bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[CRLMB-12025/2022]

¶21

Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that offences are triable by the magistrate. The accused-petitioners are behind the bar and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioners.

¶22

Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail applications.

¶23

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶24

Accordingly, the bail applications filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Karan S/o Kalu Lal Patel & (2) Surendra Kumar @ Raju S/o Radhey Shyam Somani, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.118/2022 of Police Station Chittorgarh Kotwali, District Chittorgarh, provided they execute personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶25

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶26

154-155-raksha/-

Karan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bharvindra Singh @ Bhupendra Singh Vs State

Harshdeep @ Arshdeep Vs State

M/S Eana Proteins Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Rajasthan

Munni Devi @ Komal Vs State of Rajasthan

Amrender Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mandeep Kaur @ Seema Vs State of Rajasthan