Allowed

Harshdeep @ Arshdeep v. State

Rajasthan HC12 Sept 2022CRLMB/784/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court at Jodhpur granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners apprehending arrest in an FIR involving IPC offences of rioting, assault and voluntarily causing grievous hurt. The court directed furnishing of bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail by way of personal bond in sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer/S.H.O.

Harshdeep @ Arshdeep Vs State — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 784/2022

¶3

Harshdeep @ Arshdeep S/o Shri Kheta Singh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Ward No. 9, Santpura, Tehsil Sangaria, District Hanumangarh.

¶4

Pradeep Singh S/o Shri Amar Pal Singh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Ward No. 9, Santpura, Tehsil Sangaria, District Hanumangarh.

¶5

----Petitioners Versus

State, Through Pp

----Respondent

Connected With

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 783/2022 Bharvindra Singh @ Bhupendra Singh S/o Shri Kuldeep Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 9, Santpura, Tehsil Sangaria, District Hanumangarh.

¶10

State, Through Pp	----Petitioner Versus ----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Suresh Kumbhat
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. A.R. Choudhary, PP Mr. N.K. Sharma for the complainant Mr. Shailesh Chand, SI Police Station Sangaria

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶12

Order

¶13

12/09/2022

¶14

This anticipatory bail applications have been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR No.541/2020, Police Station Sangaria, District Hanumangarh for

¶15

(2 of 3)

¶16

[CRLMB-784/2022]

¶17

the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 325 and 326 of IPC.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that previously bail bonds were deposited by the petitioner before the Police. Now, the Police has added offence punishable under Section 326 of the IPC against the petitioner and want to arrest him. The petitioner has already joined the investigation. In such circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioners behind the bars for indefinite time. Therefore, the petitioners may be released on anticipatory bail.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶20

Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order.

¶21

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶22

Accordingly, the bail applications are allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioners – (1) Harshdeep @ Arshdeep S/o Shri Kheta Singh, (2) Pradeep Singh S/o Shri Amar Pal Singh, (Bail Application No.784/2022) and (3) Bharvindra Singh @ Bhupendra Singh S/o Shri Kuldeep Singh (Bail Application No.783/2022), in connection with FIR No.541/2020, Police Station Sangaria, District Hanumangarh they shall be released on bail; provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each along with two sureties of

¶23

(3 of 3)

¶24

[CRLMB-784/2022]

¶25

Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned

¶26

Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-

¶27

(i). that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required

¶28

(ii). that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and

¶29

(iii). that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶30

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶31

104-105-Rashi/-

Harshdeep @ Arshdeep v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harshdeep @ Arshdeep v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamlesh Vs State of Rajasthan

Krishna Singh @ Pappu Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Samir Vs State of Rajasthan

Bharvindra Singh @ Bhupendra Singh Vs State

M/S Eana Proteins Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Rajasthan

Pankaj @ Meera Vs State