Allowed

Jarina Bano W/O Moinuddin v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 Apr 2022CRLMB/1082/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal miscellaneous bail application involved a petitioner facing charges under IPC 376(2)(N) and the POCSO Act. The High Court allowed her anticipatory bail application, directing that if she is arrested under FIR 212/2021, she shall be released on bail upon furnishing the required security and bond.

What did the court decide?

The anticipatory bail application was allowed. The petitioner is directed to be released on bail upon arrest subject to furnishing a bond and complying with the specified conditions.

Jarina Bano W/O Moinuddin Vs State of… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

¶2

BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

5.8. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application NO, 1082/2022 jarina Ban0 W/o Moinuddin, R/o S~ltanpur Thana Sultanpur ~istt. Kota Raj.

¶4

Versus

¶5

State Of Rajasthan, Through pp

¶6

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.A.R.KhanforMr.A.K.Khan. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Mahla, PP.

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

¶8

Order

¶9

20/04/2022

¶10

1. The present bail application has been filed by the petitioner Jarina Bano W/o Moinuddin under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR N0.212/2021 registered at Police Station Sultanpur, Kota for the offence(s) under Sections 376(2)(N) of IPC and Section 5F/6 and SL/6 of POCSO Act. 2, Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she has to do with the alleged offence and her custodial nothing interrogation would Serve no useful Purpose* ~~~~ned public prosecutor has vehemently Opposed the bail 3, application.

¶11

¶12

(2 of 2)

¶13

[CRLMB- 1082/2022]

¶14

ccordingly the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The 5. H /.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Sultanpur, Kota in F.I.R. I a

¶15

NO. 212/2021 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a bond in the sum of Rs.S0,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/each to the satisfaction of the

¶16

,./.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions: -

¶17

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶18

that the shall not or (ii) petitioner directly indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶19

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶20

(FARJAND ALI),J

¶21

PREETI VALECHA /10

Jarina Bano W/O Moinuddin v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jarina Bano W/O Moinuddin v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kunwar Singh S/O Dharam Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Pramod S/O Bheemaram @ Bheem Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Bodraj Bunkar S/O Lakhmaram Bunvkar Vs State of Rajasthan

Surajbhan Son of Shri Kishanlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Lekhraj S/O Shri Ramdayal Vs State of Rajasthan

Pramod Kumar @ Maccha S/O Shri Umrav Vs State of Rajasthan