Allowed

Chetram S/O Hanuman v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Jul 2022CRLMB/1051/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by Chetram, an accused charged with offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 341, 323, 452 and 307 IPC. The court allowed bail subject to the petitioner furnishing a personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail with a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 15,000/- each.

Chetram S/O Hanuman Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

¶2

BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1051/2022

¶4

Chetram S/o Hanuman, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Pakhal Ki Dhani Endwa Ps Malarna Dungar Dist. Sawai Madhopur Raj. (Presently Confined In Distt. Jail Sawai Madhopur)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through The pp-

¶7

K..L . - ; 3iu r. ,-, &" ... ,
*& - ". '".+\ ,-{; i ; >i ,
. . , L -. ,- , :? ! 1. '-.'. L.., - . 1 . 2: \ ,, ,, !, , ,., ,,
fi ,, "..'- ...- :; 4 -..if ----Respondent
,ci 4 5. .-' j;.' - ; ;.'--..,
...A ...,, .
.I '
V-. . -2. #, r ... -- f- L:" 3
For ~etitioner('sy .>: : ,Mr. Suresh Sahini . -..<.. -4 ., *?-.
p $. :,.:>:" r ; ... :- Mr. Ram Manohar Sharma-d4a t' 7 ,.- ,--"
For es$orident(s) \ I, : Mr. Ms. M Sharda Pathak S Saini, PP <z ,,. . 'r 4 A\ .

¶8

., . .... .. ;:; . . ,.~ ,..'e . . L , 2. & > %; . . .. .' . '> <,,,., , +'> ;::; P-l-.:' ,.:> .--, . . r L :;'J., . ..-..:;v<<;-,.:', -:.: 2.. ..-<, .' ;!, **;,..jy_** $, : :r ,* HON'B~~'~~;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ALI i , ,..: .. ,^. , - . , . : , . . 6 '. ,- ).., ;..';.., , , . $1 ,.'. . ,,'. * ". L.d,.y .\ :i., .. . ;,,:A,.,>: , " :;.;+;. , s'. . -.. !; :.;.-, : ?;,; : f, '?>..-: _$.~,.l,~~.,:<!::_ **_2%_** I.!: .. ; .:.-:* ~ . .;.,:. .:':(:,. -.;(?:;t.y , . **_I._** , \ **_2;:_** .. .- ,. .-. **21,F,~.,** >; ; .,, , .-.'< .' - &.; ,- ~ . ) ?I,; ,. , ;,; *+ .. , ;;, ,;\ :,; , ><,' . -;.;. , ( .;::;,:> . : .-:., . . . *2 :<,?,;'v,7;;:,!** . **.** . - , .,? :. /;, :.?;, >; .: : *,:.;.s;p~:.~ .^. .^**. <,, i .': 1 Y :3 ;.<;'!. a .,-"'. 04/07/2022 .. .'":. **_,::..j,_* ,.,<,,, ,>:*,'j .aA$,: 1.. &!,! I.:, 2.6 i: ..'...... . , - ,--,; , . 3> :. ! ,:.; ,- I;...'..,,;, . . .j.:>) , /,:. ., ,>L,.c+ t, .. ,.! , .. ..>. ,;*;: 1 , iJ i$;,,:;,..;2;;' < ,, ... L..,<.,_ **1.** The instant bail **applji,[email protected]+.~e.en ,:** * **L,.~5is , %** filed under Sedion 439 i; , **_6,;_** &, **ir** 1; ,'. .\ , j ! ;,i Cr.p.C. on behalf of accus&-$$titioR& Ghetram S/o Hanurnan. The . .', / !, > :;;.: :; ,; ?,Y$ **l<i,,** ;.;,-; **_,:;i_** .::, _?,,fi..;.._ .,) ij\ ,,,: $.,, , **~t; i;-*** '. , **-.q-..** petitioner **has** been **arres~$$$i)i-,~gop~~e~ti6@** ,i:.~:: . .>. . : , , ;t ',"' c . .:.; , , / ,. !.; ..,'", :.+< '..*1 . - ; j p-'. ;.: :-: . , . , $i .. with FIR NO. ., 248/202 1 . ; 2.. ; .. '\ " , - $. . - ( .I I . registered at polige! 1;. .. '. L. 1 . 1 .. ... : , ' ,.,.,:,-,, ... , -,Statsn.~~.,'Mala:ra ,,,; ...'... , b-t,; .< ,I: ->.:::%? ;.,.,! - i..' -\r-;,--; !,,..;,31= . % . +/,, ,.. .; '-.* ..t., .:, A,$:!;{/. -.<.*.<b-.. ..,<: , Dungar, District - 4, ,. ,,,.w%. . ,., ,;.,.,;.,,:d.L.<.;', Sawai madhopur for the offe-nt&(s$?u'hd8r Sections 147, 148, 149, ..; .... _5,.:;.,..2.,,; c.'"._ *. cT-'(.'.i~rf t . i,. .,, . I, 341, 3-23, 452, 307, o$;~~~.IP.! L( ,; . 1 \a? . < <. ,, 6 Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that a 2, false case has been foisted against the petitioner. He is behind the bars since long time. No useful purpose would be served by keeping him behind the bars till disposal of the case-

¶9

3. per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for both the parties. Perused the entire material made available on record. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶11

5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above .'. $ g .- ,, ,+(? :; ,$#"\ shall be enlarged 0-n YL bail ,6 $io#dedtlhk iforn~shes ..-t, y....+, a personal bond in .c-^. , \ - A,* ;J-, .>.:: -: . the sum of Rs:50,000/- with two sureties of ds.i5;000/- each to I ., .:* * ? - L. > ,, ,^.). 3' the satisfacbion of the learned trial Judge for his--.'appearance +.- ,'Is 5 /\ > . -\ . **_*'\tC I -5_* before tBe court concerned on all the dates of hearidg as and

¶12

when called upon

¶13

(FARJAN D ALI),J

¶14

GAU RAL' SHARMA 120

Chetram S/O Hanuman v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chetram S/O Hanuman v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kajod S/O Shri Ratan Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijay Kumar S/O Shri Bheru Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Shankar Lal S/O Shri Shyojiram Vs State of Rajasthan

Sampatsingh S/O Bahadursingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ishu S/O Pooran Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Golu S/O Shri Ram Chandra Vs State of Rajasthan