Allowed

Pramod Kajla v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC21 Sept 2022CRLMB/6200/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. apprehending arrest in a cheating and criminal conspiracy case, directing him to execute a personal bond with sureties and abide by specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail on condition of executing a bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each and complying with relevant conditions.

Pramod Kajla Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

(1 of 2)

¶2

[CRLMB-6200/2022]

¶3

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶4

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6200/2022

¶5

Pramod Kajla S/o Shri Lekhram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Balod Badi P.s. Fathepur Dist. Sikar, Rajasthan.

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Deepak Menaria
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. SK Mehar, PP
	Mr. Ashok Kumar Choudhary

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶12

Order

¶13

21/09/2022

¶14

This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.28/2021, Police Station Rajaldesar for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 409, 120B IPC.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co-accused namely Rohit Alariya and Gajanand have already been enlarged on bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. by a coordinate Bench of this Court and the case of the present petitioner is similar to those of the coaccused. In such circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner behind the bars for indefinite time. Thus, the petitioner may be released on anticipatory bail.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-6200/2022]

¶19

Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order.

¶20

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Pramod Kajla S/o Shri Lekhram in connection with FIR No.28/2021, Police Station Rajaldesar, the petitioner shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-

¶22

(i). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶23

(ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and

¶24

(iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶25

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶26

126-MS/-

Pramod Kajla v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramod Kajla v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chirag Vs State of Rajasthan

Nema Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Hari Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Kuldip Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Jaipal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Jaipal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan