Pradeep v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge High Court dismissed the first bail application, noting the trial court order required recording the complainant's statement, which has not been done, and is not inclined to entertain the application.
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed; liberty to file fresh application in trial court not granted due to pending recording of complainant's statement.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 102/2022
Pradeep S/o Shri Balwanta Ram, Aged About 26 Years, B/c Vishnoi, R/o Motaniya, Police Station Matoda, District Jodhpur (Raj.) (Presently Lodged At Central Jail, Jodhpur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dilip Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. BR Bishnoi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
14/09/2022
The first bail application of the petitioner was dismissed as not pressed while granting liberty to file fresh bail application before the trial court after recording the statements of complainant- Kanwar Lal.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to entertain the first bail application when the required statement of the complainant remains unrecorded.
Whether to grant interim liberty to file a fresh bail application before the trial court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pradeep S/o Shri Balwanta Ram
- respondent
State, Through Pp
Coram
Vijay Bishnoi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/102/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court