Allowed
Tarachand Khatri v. Nitin Arora
Rajasthan HCCRLLA/56/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.…
What the court decided
AI extract
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 56/2020
Tarachand Khatri S/o Kushaldas Khatri, Aged About 57 Years, Proprietor Mahalaxmi Exports 19-New Cloth Market, Sriganganagar.
----Appellant
Versus
Nitin Arora S/o Harish Arora, 1/101 Bhai Randheer Singh Nagar Ludhiyana Prop. Firm Shri A.s. Textile 833/01 Kucha Laxminarayan Near Meena Bajar Ludhilana Punjab.
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 54/2020
Tarachand Khatri S/o Kushaldas Khatri, Aged About 57 Years, Proprietor Mahalaxmi Exports 19-New Cloth Market, Sriganganagar.
----Appellant
Versus
Nitin Arora S/o Harish Arora, 1/101 Bhai Randheer Singh Nagar Ludhiyana Prop. Firm Shri A.s. Textile 833/01 Kucha Laxminarayan Near Meena Bajar Ludhilana Punjab.
----Respondent
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 55/2020
Tarachand Khatri S/o Kushaldas Khatri, Aged About 57 Years, Proprietor Mahalaxmi Exports 19-New Cloth Market, Sriganganagar.
----Appellant
Versus
Nitin Arora, 1/101 Bhai Randheer Singh Nagar Ludhiyana Prop. Firm Shri A.s. Textile 833/01 Kucha Laxminarayan Near Meena Bajar Ludhilana Punjab.
----Respondent
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 57/2020
Tarachand Khatri S/o Kushaldas Khatri, Aged About 57 Years, Proprietor Mahalaxmi Exports 19-New Cloth Market, Sriganganagar.
(2 of 2)
[CRLLA-56/2020]
----Appellant
Versus
Nitin Arora S/o Harish Arora, 1/101 Bhai Randheer Singh Nagar Ludhiyana Prop. Firm Shri A.s. Textile 833/01 Kucha Laxminarayan Near Meena Bajar Ludhilana Punjab.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Umesh Shrimali For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
23/11/2022
This Court is of the opinion that there are valid and substantial grounds for grant of leave to the appellant for filing the appeals against the impugned judgment.
Accordingly, the application for grant of leave to appeals are allowed. The memo of leave to appeals be treated as an appeals and it be registered as such.
Admit.
Let bailable warrant of Rs.25,000/- be issued against the accused-respondent.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
54-57-Sudheer/-
Tarachand Khatri
Nitin Arora
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court