Allowed

Tarachand Khatri v. Nitin Arora

Rajasthan HC23 Nov 2022CRLLA/54/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Leave to appeal was granted by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur. The appellant's application for leave to file three criminal leave to appeals was allowed, the memos were registered as appeals, and a bailable warrant for Rs. 25,000 was issued against the respondent.

What did the court decide?

Application for grant of leave to appeals allowed; memos treated as appeals; bailable warrant of Rs.25,000 issued against accused-respondent.

Tarachand Khatri Vs Nitin Arora — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 56/2020

¶3

Tarachand Khatri S/o Kushaldas Khatri, Aged About 57 Years, Proprietor Mahalaxmi Exports 19-New Cloth Market, Sriganganagar.

¶4

----Appellant

¶5

Versus

¶6

Nitin Arora S/o Harish Arora, 1/101 Bhai Randheer Singh Nagar Ludhiyana Prop. Firm Shri A.s. Textile 833/01 Kucha Laxminarayan Near Meena Bajar Ludhilana Punjab.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

Connected With

¶9

S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 54/2020

¶10

Tarachand Khatri S/o Kushaldas Khatri, Aged About 57 Years, Proprietor Mahalaxmi Exports 19-New Cloth Market, Sriganganagar.

¶11

----Appellant

¶12

Versus

¶13

Nitin Arora S/o Harish Arora, 1/101 Bhai Randheer Singh Nagar Ludhiyana Prop. Firm Shri A.s. Textile 833/01 Kucha Laxminarayan Near Meena Bajar Ludhilana Punjab.

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 55/2020

¶16

Tarachand Khatri S/o Kushaldas Khatri, Aged About 57 Years, Proprietor Mahalaxmi Exports 19-New Cloth Market, Sriganganagar.

¶17

----Appellant

¶18

Versus

¶19

Nitin Arora, 1/101 Bhai Randheer Singh Nagar Ludhiyana Prop. Firm Shri A.s. Textile 833/01 Kucha Laxminarayan Near Meena Bajar Ludhilana Punjab.

¶20

----Respondent

¶21

S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 57/2020

¶22

Tarachand Khatri S/o Kushaldas Khatri, Aged About 57 Years, Proprietor Mahalaxmi Exports 19-New Cloth Market, Sriganganagar.

(2 of 2)

[CRLLA-56/2020]

----Appellant

Versus

Nitin Arora S/o Harish Arora, 1/101 Bhai Randheer Singh Nagar Ludhiyana Prop. Firm Shri A.s. Textile 833/01 Kucha Laxminarayan Near Meena Bajar Ludhilana Punjab.

¶28

----Respondent

¶29

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Umesh Shrimali For Respondent(s) :

¶30

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶31

Order

¶32

23/11/2022

¶33

This Court is of the opinion that there are valid and substantial grounds for grant of leave to the appellant for filing the appeals against the impugned judgment.

¶34

Accordingly, the application for grant of leave to appeals are allowed. The memo of leave to appeals be treated as an appeals and it be registered as such.

¶35

Admit.

¶36

Let bailable warrant of Rs.25,000/- be issued against the accused-respondent.

¶37

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

¶38

54-57-Sudheer/-

Tarachand Khatri v. Nitin Arora

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tarachand Khatri v. Nitin Arora

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narsaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Chunni Lal Vs State

Balram Vs Vivek Birla

Mahipal Swami Vs Kishore Kumar

Tarachand Khatri Vs Nitin Arora

Tarachand Khatri Vs Nitin Arora