Partly allowed

Vinay Maheshwari Son of Tara Chand v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 Aug 2022CRLAS/1384/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Held that the court below acted in exercise of its powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash FIR and proceedings against the accused, who was previously involved in proceedings for Section 498 IPC. The High Court characterized the subsequent complaint as character assassination and remarked on the court's alternate powers (Restoring) to quash FIRs under Section 482 CrPC.

What did the court decide?

FIR and subsequent proceedings were quashed. No separate interim order raised; secondary season not barred from filing appeals.

Vinay Maheshwari Son of Tara Chand Vs State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1384/2022

¶3

Vinay Maheshwari Son Of Tara Chand, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Rajmahal,police Station Dooni, District Tonk (Raj) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail, Dausa)

¶4

----Appellant

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶7

Victim, R/o

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rajkumar Kasana, For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar, PP Mr. Ajit Kaswa for Complainant Mr. Udai Singh, RPS (IO) CO Banikui

¶10

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶11

Order

¶12

23/08/2022

¶13

vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 14&, vuqlwfpr tkfr o vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr ;g tekur vihy v/khuLFk U;k;ky;] fof'k"B U;k;k/kh'k] vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½] vf/kfu;e] nkSlk }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 21-07-2022 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh xbZ gS] ftlds }kjk iqfyl Fkkuk] ckanhdqbZ ftyk nkSlk esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&394@2022 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 498,]406]120ch]376¼2½¼,u½ Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ,oa /kkjk 3¼2½(Va), 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) ,llh@,lVh ,DV esa vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk [kkfjt fd;k x;kA

¶14

fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd ihfM+rk vkSj vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds e/; izse fookg gqvk Fkk vkSj ckn esa muds e/; fookn gks tkus ds dkj.k ihfM+rk mls vkijkf/kd izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr djus dk iz;kl dj jgh gSA mudk rdZ gS fd vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us /kkjk 13 fgUnw fookg vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr fookg foPNsn gsrq ;kfpdk fnukad 09-05-2022 dks izLrqr dj nh Fkh] blds i'pkr izfrfdz;k Lo:i fnukad 21-06-2022 dks ;g izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ntZ djokbZ xbZ gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us ihfM+rk ls fookg ds

¶15

(2 of 3)

¶16

[CRLAS-1384/2022]

¶17

QyLo:i ljdkj }kjk iznRr <kbZ yk[k :i;s dh lgk;rk jkf'k Lo;a us izkIr ugha dh gS] cfYd ihfM+rk ,oa vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds la;qDr uke ls ,QMhvkj ds :i esa tek djokbZ xbZ gS vkSj nksuksa dh lgefr ls gh jkf'k izkIr dh xbZ gSA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa ,slk dksbZ vadu ugha gS fd ihfMrk dks vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr }kjk yksd n`f"V esa viekfur djus dh uh;r ls tkfrlwpd 'kCnksa ls lEcksf/kr fd;k x;k gksA vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fnukad 20-07-2022 ls fujUrj vfHkj{kk esa gSA izdj.k ds vUos’k.k o vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxk] vr% vihy Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶18

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd ,oa fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjokfnuh us tekur vihy dk fojks/k fd;kA mudk rdZ gS fd ihfM+rk] tks fd ,llh@,lVh dh efgyk gS] ds lkFk vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us iwoZ ls gh fookfgr gksus ds ckotwn dsoy ljdkj ls izkIr gksus okyh lgk;rk jkf'k dks izkIr djus ds fy;s ihfM+rk ls fookg fd;k vkSj ckn esa mls tkfr lwpd 'kCnksa ls lEcksf/kr dj viekfur fd;k vkSj ngst dh ekax dhA vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk vijk/k xEHkhj izd`fr dk gSA vr% tekur vihy [kkfjt dh tk,A

¶19

geus mHk;i{k ds rdksZa ij euu fd;kA dsl Mk;jh ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkexzh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;kA izdj.k esa vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ij /kkjk 498,]406]120ch]376¼2½¼,u½ Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ,oa /kkjk 3¼2½(Va), 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) ,llh@,lVh ,DV ds vkjksi gSaA vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr iwoZ ls fookfgr Fkk vkSj mlus bl rF; dks Nqikdj ihfM+rk ls fookg fd;k gks] ,slk vUos"k.k ls Li"V ugha gqvk gSA vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh vkt U;k;ky; esa O;fDrxr :i ls mifLFkr gSa] ls U;k;ky; }kjk iwNus ij mUgksaus Lohdkjk fd ,slh dksbZ lk{; vuqla/kku i=koyh ij ugha gS] ftlls vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk iwoZ ls gh fookfgr gksuk izekf.kr gksrk gks] ek= ihfM+rk ds /kkjk 164 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds dFkuksa esa gh ;g rF; vk;k gSA dsl Mk;jh ds voyksdu ls Li"V gS fd ihfM+rk ftl <kbZ yk[k :i;s dh lgk;rk jkf'k dks vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr }kjk csbZekuh ls izkIr djuk dgrh gS] og jkf'k nksuksa dh lgefr ls ?kj [kpZ ds fy;s vko';drk gksus ij la;qDr [kkrs ls fudkyk tkuk izdV gqvk gSA vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fnukad 20-07-2022 ls fujUrj vfHkj{kk esa gSA vUos"k.k ls Hkh mlds fo:) /kkjk 498, o 506 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ,oa ,llh@,lVh dk vijk/k cuuk ik;k x;k gSA izdj.k ds vUos’k.k o vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA bu gkykr esa xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ er O;Dr fd;s fcuk vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vihy Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶20

ifj.kker% vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fou; ekgs'ojh dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vihy Lohdkj dh tkrh gS vkSj v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k

¶21

(3 of 3) [CRLAS-1384/2022]

¶22

fnukad 21-07-2022 vikLr fd;k tkrk gSA ;fn vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr;kWa izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶23

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶24

Pradeep Thawani /80

Vinay Maheshwari Son of Tara Chand v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinay Maheshwari Son of Tara Chand v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sukhdev S/O Shri Narsiram Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Ajeet @ Jitu Son of Ashok Kumar @ Surja Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Kumar @ Monu S/O Laxmanram Vs State of Rajasthan

Sachin Mahapatra Son of Shri Dilip Kumar Mahapatra Vs State of Rajasthan

Tikam S/O Lal Singh Jat Vs State of Rajasthan

Babulal Son of Govindram Vs State of Rajasthan