The High Court of Rajasthan granted bail to the petitioner in B.S. 11746/2022, holding that the reasons for earlier detention orders had dissolved and the petitioner was entitled to bail by virtue of Section 392 CrPC.
Bail granted to the petitioner under Section 392 CrPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11746/2022
Ajeet @ Jitu Son Of Ashok Kumar @ Surja, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Balod Badi, P.s. Sadar Fatehpur, Distt. Sikar (Raj.) ( At Present Distt Jail Sikar)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ripu Daman Singh Naruka and Ms. Prishaa Singh Sisodia RFor Respondent(s) : Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
22/08/2022
izkFkhZ dh vksj ls iqfyl Fkkuk& lnj] Qrsgiqj ftyk lhdj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 6@2021 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 323] 341] 392 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa tekur dk ykHk fn, tkus gsrq ;g izkFkZuk i= /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh xbZ ,oa dsl Mk;jh dk voyksdu fd;k
x;kA
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dk rdZ jgk fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks bl ekeys esa feF;k :i ls Qalk;k x;k gS] izdj.k ds lgvfHk;qDr fodkl dqekj xksnkjk dh tekur dk izkFkZuk i= bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk iwoZ esa fnukad 1-6-2021 dks Lohdkj fd;k tk pqdk gS rFkk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk ekeyk mlls fHkUu ugha gSA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ esa eqdnesa ntZ gksus ek= ds vk/kkj ij tekur dh lqfo/kk ls budkj fd;k tkuk fof/klEer ugha gSA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu jgk fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dkQh le; ls vfHkj{kk gS] izdj.k ds vuqla/kku esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd, tkus dk fuosnu djrs gSA
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-11746/2022]
;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;k ,oa dFku fd;k fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 392 Hkknala dk vfHk;ksx gS] ftlesa orZeku esa vuqla/kku py jgk gS rFkk mlds fo:) iwoZ esa pkj vU; izdj.k Hkh ntZ gq, gSaA vr% leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu djrs gSaA
lquk x;k ,oa izLrqr rdksZa ij fopkj fd;k x;k rFkk dsl Mk;jh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
Lohd`r :i ls izdj.k ds vU; lgvfHk;qDr fodkl dqekj xksnkjk dk tekur izkFkZuk i= bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk fnuakd 1-6-2021 dks Lohdkj fd;k tk pqdk gS rFkk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk ekeyk mDr lgvfHk;qDr ls fHkUu ugha gSA tgka rd vfHk;qDr ds iwoZ esa ntZ vkijkf/kd izdj.kksa dk iz'u gS] bl lUnHkZ esa lgvfHk;qDr fodkl dqekj ds fo:) izkFkhZ ls vf/kd xaHkhj ekeys yfEcr gksus dks ns[krs gq,] izkFkhZ dk ekeyk mlls csgrj izrhr gksrk gSA vr% izdj.k esa miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr] izLrqr rdksZa ,oa lgvfHk;qDr dks iwoZ esa led{k ihB }kjk tekur ij eqDr djus ds rF; dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ vthr mQZ thrw dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa ;ksX; fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr;kWa izLrqr dj rLnhd djkosa rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
JITENDRA SINGH PANWAR /86
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 392 CrPC.
Whether the reasons in the Court Administrator's order differ from the case administrator's order.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajeet @ Jitu
State Of Rajasthan
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
