Ram Chandra v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The single-judge court dismissed an appeal filed under Section 331 of CrPC as infructuous, holding that a regular appeal challenging the same order between the same parties had already been decided.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed on the ground that it is infructuous due to the existence of an earlier decided appeal on the same matter.
What the court decided
(1 of 1)
[CRLA-331/1993]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 331/1993
Ram Chandra
----Appellant
Versus
State
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Abhishek Charan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
20/07/2022
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present jail appeal is multiplicitous and infructuous given an existing regular appeal on the same matter?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ram Chandra
- respondent
State
Coram
Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/331/1993
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court