Sahab Ram v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
An S.B. Criminal Appeal was dismissed as infructuous because the appellant had already undergone the awarded sentence, as verified by the Public Prosecutor's report.
What did the court decide?
The criminal appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 264/2012
Sahab Ram
----Appellant
Versus
State
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rajender Soni For Respondent(s) : Mr. Salim Khan Mehar, PP
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
24/11/2022
Counsel for the appellant fairly submits that the sentence awarded to accused-appellant has already been undergone by him.
Learned PP supports the fact while submitting report in this behalf, which is taken on record.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal appeal should stand dismissed as the appellant has completed his sentence.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sahab Ram
- respondent
State
Coram
DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/264/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court