The High Court allowed the appeal to be dismissed as withdrawn by the appellants after an out-of-court settlement, directing the disbursement of any deposited decree amount to the respondents.
Appeal to be dismissed as withdrawn; decretal amount to be disbursed if deposited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 467/2013
----Appellants/Defendants
Versus
----Respondents-Plaintiffs
----Performa Respondents-Defendants
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Poonam Chand Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ram Ratan Gurjar Mr. Deepak Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
26/07/2022
(2 of 2)
[CFA-467/2013]
No.28/2007 passed by Additional District Judge Bandikui District Dausa whereby and whereunder civil suit filed by respondentsplaintiffs decreed for recovery of Rs.98,049/- with interest @6% per annum.
Learned counsel for appellants submits that the amount was deposited.
Learned counsel for respondents has no objection however, he submits that amount deposited before the trial court be disbursed in accordance with the impugned decree.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
SAURABH/63
Bhooli
Gyani
Rukmani
Bacchi
Ram Singh
Heeralal
Sudeesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
