A single judge heard a contempt petition alleging non-compliance with a prior order. The court held that counsel's submission that the order was complied with removed any ground for interference and disposed of the petition.
Petition disposed of; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 455/2016
Raj Kumar Singh, aged about 24 years, S/o Shri Ramchandra Singh Yadav, resident of 107, Shanti Kunj, Alwar
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Raghav, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA
Order
20/05/2022
Petitioner has filed the petition alleging that the respondents have disobeyed the order passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court dated 14.12.2015.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the order dated 14.12.2015 passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court has been complied with.
Keeping in view the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, no ground for further interference by this Court is called for.
Petition stands disposed of. Rule is discharged.
(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J
PAYAL/C-1
Raj Kumar Singh
Pawan Kumar Goyal
B.L. Kothari
Chandra Kumar Songara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
