In a contempt petition under S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1113/2016, the petitioner submitted that their representation was considered, rendering the petition infructuous. The single-judge bench dismissed the petition on these grounds.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1113/2016
Sita Ram Sharma S/o Shri Surajmal Sharma, Aged about 46 years, R/o Panchlangi Via Sarai, District Jhunjhunu
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents-Contemnors
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chiranji Lal Saini, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA
Order
19/05/2022
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the representation of the petitioner has been considered. Hence, the contempt petition has become infructuous.
The contempt petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J
PAYAL/8
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition is maintainable since the representation and representation of the petitioner has been considered.
Sita Ram Sharma
Shrimat Pandey
Kamlesh Abusara
M.L. Nehra
Dinesh Kothari
Chandra Kumar Songara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
