The High Court discharged a review petition filed by Shiv Kumar Arora, holding that subsequent facts regarding an acquittal cannot form the basis for deciding a review petition. The petition was dismissed.
The review petition is dismissed as subsequent facts of acquittal cannot be considered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 140/2018
Shiv Kumar Arora S/o Late Sh. Girdhari Lal, R/o Plot No. A-50B, Jai Ambey Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
| Versus |
|---|
| 1. Chairman, Rajasthan State |
| Road Transport Corporation, Head Office, Jaipur 2. Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Head Office, Jaipur |
| 3. Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, |
| Sikar. ----Respondents |
| For Petitioner(s) : Mr. C.P.Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinayak Kumar Joshi |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
03/03/2021
The petitioner has filed review petition on the basis of subsequent facts of acquittal cannot be taken into consideration for deciding the review petition.
The review petition is accordingly dismissed.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
Anu /25
1 issue framed by the court
Whether subsequent fact of acquittal in a criminal proceeding can be considered for deciding a review petition.
Shiv Kumar Arora
Chairman, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation
Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation
Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Sikar
Sanjeiv Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
