The single respondent petitioner application was allowed restoring the writ petition to its original number based on reasons assigned in the restoration application.
The writ petition is restored to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 1)
[WRES-33/2021]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 33/2021
----Petitioners
Versus
| ----Respondents | ||
|---|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) |
: Mr. Kartar Singh : |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
23/03/2021
Learned counsel states that PF & notices have already been filed.
Heard on the application for restoration of the writ petition. For the reasons assigned in the application for restoration of the writ petition, the same is allowed. The writ petition is restored to its original number.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
Pcg/28
Bharat Lal Gurjar
Narendra Yadav
State Of Rajasthan
Rajasthan Public Service Commission
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
