Allowed

Seema Rani Gupta W/O Sh. Santosh Kumar Gupta D/O Sh. Revati Prasad Gupta v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Sept 2021WRES/121/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allowed condonation of delay in filing a writ restoration application. Restored the original S.B. Civil Writ Petition to its original number. Set a three-week timeline to remove defects pointed out previously, or the restoration will conclude. Discussed nature of defects.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of delay allowed. Original writ petition restored to original number. Three weeks given to remove defects.

Seema Rani Gupta W/O Sh. Santosh Kumar Gupta D/O… — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 121/2020

¶3

Seema Rani Gupta W/o Sh. Santosh Kumar Gupta D/o Sh. Revati Prasad Gupta, Aged About 50 Years, R/o C-284, Maheah Nagar, Jaipur, Distt. Jaipur (Raj.)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Elementary Education, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).

¶7

Director (Elementary) Education, Bikaner (Raj.) 3. Dy. Director (Elementary) Education, Region Bharatpur (Raj.)

¶8

District Education Officer (Elementary), Sawai Madhopur (Raj.)

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	SanjaySharma.
For Respondent(s)	:

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Order

¶12

03/09/2021

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner on application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay in filing the restoration application.

¶14

For the reasons indicated in the application, supported by affidavit, the same is allowed. The delay in filing the restoration application is condoned.

¶15

Heard on restoration application.

¶16

For the reasons indicated in the restoration application, supported by affidavit, the same is allowed. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9772/2015 is restored to its original number.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[WRES-121/2020]

¶19

The writ petition was dismissed on account of non-removal of defects pointed out by the office.

¶20

The same may now be removed within a period of three weeks. On failure to remove the defects within said period of three weeks, the order passed today, restoring the writ petition, shall come to an end automatically.

¶21

(ARUN BHANSALI),J

¶22

SUMIT SHARMA /28

Seema Rani Gupta W/O Sh. Santosh Kumar Gupta D/O Sh. Revati Prasad Gupta v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Seema Rani Gupta W/O Sh. Santosh Kumar Gupta D/O Sh. Revati Prasad Gupta v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uday Singh S/O- Shri. Ramkaran Vs State of Rajasthan

Tarawati Daughter of Shri Dayaram Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Sandeep Choudhary S/O Hema Ram Jat Vs the State of Rajasthan

Smt. Geeta Pareek S/O Late Shri Virendra Pareek Vs State of Rajasthan

Chetram Meena Vs Commissioner College Education Ors.

Harlal Singh Son of Shri Sukhdev Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan