Allowed

Smt. Geeta Pareek S/O Late Shri Virendra Pareek v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Sept 2021CW/20744/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge allowed the writ petition declaring the petitioner entitled to specific selection grades and pay scales upon completion of 18 and 27 years of service. Arrears are directed to be paid from the date of institution of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner declared entitled to grant of pay scale and selection grades; arrears admissible from institutional date.

Smt. Geeta Pareek S/O Late Shri Virendra… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20744/2019

¶3

Smt. Geeta Pareek S/o Late Shri Virendra Pareek, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Nai Sadak, Kachahari Road, Ladiya Mohalla, Alwar (Raj.)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶7

The Chief Engineer (Administration), Public Health Engineering Department, P.h.e.d. Office Campus, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶8

The Superintending Engineer, City Circle (North), Public Health Engineering Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Umesh Vyas. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Imran Khan

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

Order

03/09/2021

Heard.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by a decision rendered in Sohanlal Mathur Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.:S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3631/2008 , decided on 17.11.2008, which has been affirmed by Apex Court in SLP (Civil) No.14932/2012.

¶16

Learned Single Judge of this Court, while deciding the case of Sohanlal (supra) has relied on an earlier judgment in Sharvan Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B.Civil Writ Petition

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CW-20744/2019]

¶19

No.2156/2007, decided on 05.09.2008). The Court held:-

¶20

“In view of whatever said above, this petition for writ deserves acceptance and, therefore, the same is allowed. The respondents are directed to allow selection grade to the petitioner on completion of 18 years of service as per para 5 of the notifications dated 25.1.1992 and 17.02.1998. The petitioner is declared entitled for getting the pay scale of Rs.1400-2600 (Rs.5000-8000) as second selection grade on completion of 18 years of service and the pay scale of Rs.5500-9000 on completion of 27 years of service as the third selection grade. The entitlement as declared above is required to be executed by the respondents within a period of six months from today.”

¶21

In this view of the matter, the instant petition is also allowed in the same terms and the petitioner is declared entitled for the grant of pay scale of Rs.4000-6000 instead of Rs.1200-2050 as third selection grade. It is directed that arrears on account of pay fixation would be admissible to the petitioner only w.e.f. 3 years preceding institution of the writ petition before this Court on 26.11.2019. Respondents would ensure compliance of the present order within 3 months from the date the certified copy of the order is presented to them.

¶22

(ARUN BHANSALI),J

¶23

84/PKS

Smt. Geeta Pareek S/O Late Shri Virendra Pareek v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Geeta Pareek S/O Late Shri Virendra Pareek v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uday Singh S/O- Shri. Ramkaran Vs State of Rajasthan

Tarawati Daughter of Shri Dayaram Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Sandeep Choudhary S/O Hema Ram Jat Vs the State of Rajasthan

Seema Rani Gupta W/O Sh. Santosh Kumar Gupta D/O Sh. Revati Prasad Gupta Vs State of Rajasthan

Chetram Meena Vs Commissioner College Education Ors.

Harlal Singh Son of Shri Sukhdev Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan