Anita v. Rajwanti
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Rajasthan recalled an order containing the erroneous inclusion of the words 'family court' on the petitioner's application, allowing the correction and directing fresh listing for admission.
What did the court decide?
Correction of the order by removing the words 'family court'; writ petition to be listed again for admission.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 82/2021
In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2384/2021
Anita Rani W/o Shri Satish Bairwa, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Binjari, Tehsil Uniara, District Tonk (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
- Rajwanti @ Rajanti W/o Shri Laxman Bairwa, Aged 40 Years, R/o Binjari, Tehsil Uniara, District Tonk (Rajasthan).
- District Collector, Tonk (District Election Officer, Tonk).
- Returning Offier (Gram Panchayat Bilaspur), through Election Office, Tonk (Rajasthan).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Yadav For Respondent(s) :
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the words 'family court' erroneously crept into the order passed by the lower court should be excised.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anita Rani W/o Shri Satish Bairwa
- respondent
Rajwanti @ Rajanti W/o Shri Laxman Bairwa
- respondent
District Collector, Tonk
- respondent
Returning Offier (Gram Panchayat Bilaspur)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- WMAP/82/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court