Petitioner challenged his impleadment rejection in a suit for mandatory injunction to restore electricity. The High Court held a complainant cannot be a party to defend the Electricity Department's action. Writ petition failed.
Writ petition fails; impugned order rejecting impleadment application is upheld; stay petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7178/2021
Aslam Khan Adopted S/o Sh. Khudabaksh Jainda S/o Jamal Baksh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bag Ka Darwaza, Ranawas, Tehsil- Marwar Junction, District- Pali (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aidan Choudhary
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
18/11/2021
(2 of 3)
[CW-7178/2021]
(3 of 3)
[CW-7178/2021]
(DINESH MEHTA),J
26-Amar/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a complainant who triggered disconnection of electricity supply is a necessary party in a suit seeking mandatory injunction for restoration of connection.
Whether the trial court erred in rejecting the impleadment application of the complainant in an injunction suit.
Aslam Khan
Additional Engineer, Jodhpur Discom
Sahida Bano
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
