The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur disposed of the writ petition as infructuous due to efflux of time without substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6394/2011
Vijay Pal
----Petitioner
Versus
Maharana Pratap .u.of.agri And Ors.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. G.R. Punia, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Rajendra Prasad Ms. Pintu Pareek
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
29/11/2021
Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that the writ petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time.
In light of such submission, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Stay petition also stands dismissed.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
10-Zeeshan
Vijay Pal
Maharana Pratap .u.of.agri
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
