Allowed

Suresh Kumar Bhandari v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 Nov 2021CW/5425/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice Dinesh Mehta allowed the writ petition relying on Mohan Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. The appeal was restored to the appellate authority for deciding the condonation of delay application, and the stay application was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed; appeal restored to appellate authority for condonation of delay; stay application disposed of.

Suresh Kumar Bhandari Vs the State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5425/2020

¶3

Suresh Kumar Bhandari S/o Shri Kajodimal, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Thsil Amet District Rajsamand Through Its Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Mohammad Tosif Silawat S/o Sarif Mohammad Silawat Aged 33 Year, R/o N.h. 8, Opposite Annapurna Dharmakata, Sewali Rajnagar District Rajsamand. (Raj.).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Mines Department Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶7

The Joint Secretary (Mines Department), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

The Director, Mines And Geology Department, Directorate, Udaipur.

¶9

The Assistant Mining Engineer, Mines And Geology Department, Sojat City, District Pali.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.L.R. Vyas For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mrigraj Singh

¶12

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶13

Order

¶14

20/11/2021

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the issue involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment passed by this Court in case of Mohan Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No.9092/2021), which has been decided by this Court vide its order dated 15.11.2021.

¶16

Learned counsel for the respondents is not in a position to dispute the aforesaid factual position.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CW-5425/2020]

¶19

In view of the aforesaid and following the reasons given in the case of Mohan Ram (supra), the present writ petition is allowed.

¶20

The appeal filed by the petitioner is restored to the dockets of Appellate Authority. Petitioner will place a copy of this order before the Appellate Authority, who in turn will intimate the date of hearing to the petitioner, whereafter the application for condonation of delay shall be decided in light of the judgment of this Court in case of Madan Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No.14920/2017) decided on 11.05.2018 so also the judgment of this Court rendered in case of Mohan Ram (supra).

¶21

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶22

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶23

155-skm/-

Suresh Kumar Bhandari v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Kumar Bhandari v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Decising of Cloths Vs State of Rajasthan

Aslam Khan Adopted Vs Additional Engineer

Smt. Santosh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Bheel Vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

M/S. Alwar Shahpura Transport Company Vs Hinduja Leyland Finance Ltd.

Bhanwar Lal Vs State of Rajasthan