Petitioner filed a writ petition. Counsel sought withdrawal citing a compromise. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, addressing no substantive legal issue.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4226/2020
Om Prakash Khandelwal, S/o Late Shri Moolchand, Aged About 64 Years, By Caste-Mahajan, R/o Srimadhopur, Distt.- Sikar, Now Residing At 145, Sukhdev Nagar, Extension No.2, Aerodrum Road, Indore-452005
----Petitioner
Versus
(2 of 3)
[CW-4226/2020]
(3 of 3)
[CW-4226/2020]
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rishabh Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nikhil Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA Order
13/08/2021
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the writ petition stating that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties.
Keeping in view thereof, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
Arun/179
Om Prakash Khandelwal
Smt. Sohni Devi
Smt. Anita
Smt. Sunita
Smt. Babita
Narayan Khandelwal
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
