Allowed

Satyendra Singh Rathore v. Central Board of Secondary Education

Rajasthan HC10 Nov 2021CW/3687/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court disposed of a writ petition directed at the Central Board of Secondary Education. The court held the respondent liable to correct the petitioner's name particulars in its records, as per the Supreme Court judgment in Jigya Yadav. The respondent was given a three-week window to file an application.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed with direction to petitioners to file application for name correction within three weeks; C.B.S.E. to act within eight weeks.

Satyendra Singh Rathore Vs Central Board of… — Education and Admissions | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3687/2020

¶3

Satyendra Singh Rathore S/o Shri Atmaramji Rathore, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 42-43, Paradise Residency, In Front Of Housing Board, Akra Bhatta, Tehsil Abu Road, District Sirohi.

¶4

Morin Singh S/o Shri Satyendra Singh, Aged About 17 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 42-43, Paradise Residency, In Front Of Housing Board, Akra Bhatta, Tehsil Abu Road, District Sirohi Minor Through His Father Shri Satyendra Singh Rathore Son Of Shri Atmaram Ji, The Petitioner No. 1.

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

Central Board Of Secondary Education, Regional Office, Todermal Marg, Ajmer Through Its Section Officer.

¶8

The Principal, H.g. International School, Near Jain Temple, Manpur, Abu Road, District Sirohi.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Shah Bhawari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Khatri

¶11

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶12

Judgment

¶13

10/11/2021

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment dated 03.06.2021 passed by Hon’ble the Supreme Court in the case of Jigya Yadav (Minor) (Through Guardian/Father Hari Singh) Vs. C.B.S.E. (Cnetral Board of Secondary Education) & Ors. in Civil Appeal No.3905/2011.

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CW-3687/2020]

¶17

He submits that in light of the judgment of Jigya Yadav (supra) , the respondent – C.B.S.E. is supposed to correct the particulars of petitioner’s name in its record.

¶18

Mr. Khatri, learned counsel for the respondents is not in a position to dispute the aforesaid position of facts and law. 4. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to file application for change/correction in their name alongwith all requisite documents as required by Hon’ble the Supreme Court in the judgment of Jigya Yadav (supra).

¶19

In case, application is filed with requisite fees and documents within a period of three weeks from today, the Central Board of Secondary Education shall consider the same in accordance with law, particularly in light of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble the Supreme Court rendered in the case of Jigya Yadav (supra) and do the needful within a period of eight weeks of receiving the application.

¶20

The writ petition as well as stay application stand disposed of.

¶21

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶22

103-Rahul/-

Satyendra Singh Rathore v. Central Board of Secondary Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyendra Singh Rathore v. Central Board of Secondary Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Legal Representatives of Sahab Ram Vs Ami Lal

Dr. Himanshu Agarwal Vs Sampat Lal

Ramesh Sharma Vs the Union of India

Swaroop Singh Vs Bal Singh

Bhawani Singh Raol Vs Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd.

Chunni Lal Vs Samsut Chothani Ojha