Writ petition challenging an order permitting an agreement to be marked as exhibit despite objections regarding forgery and spurious stamp papers. Court found no infirmity as such objections must be decided after evidence.
Writ petition dismissed; stay petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2457/2020
----Petitioners
Versus
Ami Lal S/o Shri Jotram, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Chak 6 E Chhoti, Jagdamba Colony, Hakam Maruti Garage Road, Backside Of New Loha Mandi, Road No. 1, Sri Ganganagar (Rajasthan).
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Bishnoi for Mr. Trilok Joshi
(2 of 3)
[CW-2457/2020]
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
09/11/2021
(3 of 3)
[CW-2457/2020]
irregularity in the order impugned. The procedure adopted by the trial Court is the correct approach.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
1-Amar/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court erred in allowing an agreement dated 2004 to be marked as exhibit despite objections regarding forgery and spurious stamp papers.
Legal Representatives Of Sahab Ram and Others
Ami Lal S/o Shri Jotram
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
