Allowed

Ganga Ram v. the Union of India

Rajasthan HC22 Nov 2021CW/3665/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, petitioners deposited money with Navjeevan Credit Cooperative Society, which later closed. They sought release of their deposits while others were paid. The court directed respondents to decide on their claim within ninety days and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to decide on petitioners' claim application for release of deposits within ninety days.

Ganga Ram Vs the Union of India — Cooperative Societies | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3665/2021

¶3

Ganga Ram S/o Gordhan Ram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Berdo Ka Pana, Macharo, Ki Dhani, Bero Ka Pana, Barmer, Rajasthan.

¶4

Mohan Ram S/o Fusa Ram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Koshle Ki Dhani, Udasar, Barmer, Rajasthan.

¶5

Babu Devi W/o Ganga Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Main Choraha Gudamalani Road, Dhorimanna, District Barmer.

¶6

Deva Ram S/o Teja Ram, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Pabu Bera, Bheemthal, Tehsil Gudamalani, Bhimthal, District Barmer.

¶7

Pratapa Ram S/o Ana Ram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Koshale Ki Dhani, Udasar, Dhorimanna, District Barmer.

¶8

Dapue Devi W/o Goga Ram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Bano Ki Beri, Dudhu, Gudamalani, District Barmer.

¶9

Gunesha Ram S/o Thakra Ram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Heraj Ka Gol, Tehsil Gudamalani, Piparly, District Barmer.

¶10

Sata Ram S/o Hukma Ram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Koshle Ki Dhani, Udasar, Dhorimanna, District Barmer.

¶11

Gordhan Ram S/o Mangla Ram, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Der, District Barmer.

¶12

Rama Ram S/o Durga Ram, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Adharsh Lukhu, District Barmer.

¶13

Viram Singh S/o Swroop Singh, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Dhorimanna, District Barmer.

¶14

----Petitioners

¶15

Versus

¶16

The Union Of India, Through Its Joint Secretary (Co-Op) And Central Registrar, Room No. 244, Department Of Agriculture, Cooperation And Farmers Welfare, Ministry Of Agriculture And Farmers Welfare, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi - 110001

¶17

Superintendent Of Police, Sog And Ats, Office Of The Special Operation Group Rajasthan Police, Jaipur - Delhi National Highway , Jaipur Rajasthan.

¶18

The Registrar, Rajasthan Co-Operative Societies, Nehru

¶19

(2 of 3)

¶20

[CW-3665/2021]

¶21

Sahakar Bhawan, C-Scheme Road, Jaipur Rajasthan.

¶22

Navjeevan Credit Cooperative Society Limited (Multi State), Through Its Managing Director / Chief General Manager, Registered And Head Office High School Road, Barmer Rajasthan.

¶23

----Respondents

¶24

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Sankhala For Respondent(s) : Mr. K. S. Rajpurohit, AAG assisted by Mr. Rajat Arora and Mr. Lucky Rajpurohit

¶25

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶26

Order

¶27

22/11/2021

¶28

I. A. No.01/2021 & No.02/2021 :

¶29

For the reasons stated in the application, the same are allowed.

¶30

The matter is taken up for consideration today itself.

¶31

SB Civil Writ Petition No.3665/2021 :

¶32

The limited grievance that the petitioners have raised in this case is that they had made certain deposits in the respondent No.4 – Navjeevan Credit Cooperative Society Ltd. under various schemes and heads, however, subsequently the respondent No.4 establishment has been closed and at the instance of respondent No.3 and a Liquidator was also appointed.

¶33

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that meanwhile the deposits of other creditors were released, however, the deposits made by the petitioners were not released. The petitioners make a limited prayer that the respondents may be directed to take a decision on the claim application of the petitioners seeking release of the amount lying deposited with the respondent No.4.

¶34

(3 of 3) [CW-3665/2021]

¶35

The limited request made by the petitioners is not opposed by the learned Additional Advocate General.

¶36

Accordingly, the respondents are directed to take a decision on the application filed by the petitioners expeditiously preferably within a period of ninety days from the date of receipt of copy of this order strictly in accordance with rules and guidelines.

¶37

The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.

¶38

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶39

114-A.Arora/-

Ganga Ram v. the Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganga Ram v. the Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Bheel Vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

Suresh Kumar Bhandari Vs the State of Rajasthan

M/S. Alwar Shahpura Transport Company Vs Hinduja Leyland Finance Ltd.

Bheemsen @ Bheembux Vs Municipality, Suratgarh

Lrs of Sukhdeo Singh Vs Adm (a) Sri Ganganagar

Harish Suhalka Vs Union Bank of India