In this writ petition, petitioners challenged non-appointment after selection for a Gram Panchayat Sahayak post. The court observed they were working on a contractual basis and held no right to claim permanent appointment
The writ petition was dismissed as the petitioner had no right to claim a permanent appointment on a contractual post.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3587/2021
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Ms. Neelu Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
22/03/2021
(2 of 2) [CW-3587/2021]
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
SAURABH YADAV /670/104
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a person appointed to a contractual post can claim a permanent appointment despite selection.
Whether the writ petition for appointment as Gram Panchayat Sahayak has merits.
Poonam Devi W/o Vinod Kumar
Rameshwar Dayal S/o Sube Singh
The State Of Rajasthan
The Principal Education Secretary
The Director (Primary) Education, Bikaner
The District Collector, Alwar
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Saurabh Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
