Shobharam v. Kanhaiya Lal
Case brief
What is this about?
In a civil writ petition challenging impleadment of a respondent with a mining lease on disputed land, the High Court held the impleader justified and dismissed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed; impleadment of respondent no.1 upheld.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2414/2021
- Shobharam S/o Shri Choutharamn, Aged About 65 Years, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Pundlu, Tehsil Merta, District Nagaur.
- Rajendra S/o Bhikaram, Aged About 36 Years, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Pundlu, Tehsil Merta, District Nagaur.
- Suresh S/o Bhikaram, Aged About 29 Years, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Pundlu, Tehsil Merta, District Nagaur.
- Smt. Maina W/o Bhikaram, Aged About 52 Years, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Pundlu, Tehsil Merta, District Nagaur.
- Smt. Kamla W/o Shri Durga Ram, Aged About 56 Years, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Pundlu, Tehsil Merta, District Nagaur.
- Smt. Shobha Devi W/o Durga Ram, Aged About 51 Years, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Pundlu, Tehsil Merta, District Nagaur.
- ----Petitioners
Versus
- Kanhaiya Lal S/o Shri Ramchandra, B/c Gurjar, R/o Village Harsolao, Tehsil Merta, District Nagaur.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether impleadment of respondent no.1 with a mining lease on the questioned land is justified for comprehensive adjudication.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SHOBHARAM S/O SHRI CHOUTHARAMN
- petitioner
RAJENDRA S/O BHIKARAM
- petitioner
SURESH S/O BHIKARAM
- petitioner
SMT. MAINA W/O BHIKARAM
- respondent
KANHAIYA LAL S/O SHRI RAMCHANDRA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/2414/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court