Dismissed

Sharda Sinwar D/O Rugha Ram Sinwar v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 Sept 2021CW/2095/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses the present writ petitions by relying on the Sangeeta Mathews judgment. It directs the respondent authorities to accord appointment to the petitioner if she meets other eligibility criteria, issue necessary orders by May 31, 2021, and grant notional benefits from January 24, 2020.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of rejection list qua petitioner; direction to accord appointment if eligible; issuance of appointment order by 31.05.2021; entitlement for notional benefits w.e.f. 24.01.2020.

Sharda Sinwar D/O Rugha Ram Sinwar Vs the… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

¶2

BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2095/2020

¶4

Sharda Sinwar D/o Rugha Ram Sinwar, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Vpo Jochina, Tehsil Jayal, District Nagaur, Rajasthan.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Medical, Health And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶8

The Additional Director (Administration), Medical And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶9

The Registrar, Rajasthan Nursing Council, B-39, Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302001

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.P. Saini. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashutosh Yoda for Mr. Vivek Tyagi, DGC.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Order

¶13

07/09/2021

¶14

Learned counsel for the parties submit that issue raised in the present writ petitions is squarely covered by order of this Court in Sangeeta Mathews v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1552/2020 decided on 19.04.2021 at principal seat, Jodhpur and, therefore, the present writ petitions may also be decided in light of the said judgment.

¶15

In the case of Sangeeta Mathews (Supra) the Court inter-alia

¶16

directed as under:-

¶17

“If the respondents’ stand that immediately on grant of no objection certificate by Rajasthan Nursing Council, a candidate’s registration stands cancelled is taken to its logical end, then in the opinion of this Court, during the interregnum period of issuance of a no objection certificate by RNC and grant of registration by other State, a duly qualified and eligible Nurse GradeII/Midwife would lend themselves in no man’s land - a situation of having no registration at all. Such situation, would naturally impinge upon a candidate’s fundamental rights guaranteed by Articles 14, 16 and19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CW-2095/2020]

¶20

That apart, the petitioner had applied for renewal of her registration on 18.01.2019 and again applied for fresh registration on 19.08.2019. It was thus, the fault of the respondent – Nursing Council, which sat tight over the matter and neither renewed petitioner’s registration nor did it issue any notice to her. Redtapism prevalent in RNC has resulted in rejection of petitioner’s candidature.

¶21

In the backdrop of factual matrix of the case in hands, this Court does not find the petitioner to be faultering or erring, in any manner.

¶22

As a necessary corollary or consequence of discussions forgoing, the writ petition succeeds. The list dated 08.01.2020 reflecting petitioner’s name in the list of rejected candidates, is, therefore, quashed and set aside, albeit, qua the petitioner.

¶23

The respondents are directed to accord appointment to the petitioner, if she fulfills other eligibility criteria.

¶24

Appointment order and requisite positing order be issued to the petitioner latest by 31.05.2021.

¶25

The petitioner shall be entitled for notional benefits w.e.f. 24.01.2020, when the persons, less meritorious than her, have been given/offered appointment (vide select list dated24.01.2020).

¶26

Costs made easy.76.All interlocutory applications, including stay application stand disposed of.”

¶27

In view of the submissions made by counsel for the parties, these present writ petitions are also decided in terms of and with directions as given in the case of Sangeeta Mathews (Supra).

¶28

(ARUN BHANSALI),J

¶29

102-PRADEEP KUMAR LIMBA /686

Sharda Sinwar D/O Rugha Ram Sinwar v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sharda Sinwar D/O Rugha Ram Sinwar v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raghuraj Singh S/O Shri Bhulli Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Pareveen Singh Gehlot S/O Late Sh. B.S. Gehlot Vs Union of India

Kusumlata Bhardwaj D/O Shri Om Prakash Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Roshan Lal Baswal Son of Shri Prem Chand Khatik Vs State of Rajasthan

Kumher Singh Dhakad S/O Shri Mani Ram Dhakad Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukut Bihari S/O Shri Badri Lal, Vs State of Rajasthan